Latest News
RMI Admits Their Report Does Not Demonstrate Relationship Between Gas Stoves & Asthmsa
January 13, 2022
Washington, D.C. – RMI today finally admitted that the paper does not demonstrate a causal relationship between gas stove use and asthma. In a statement, they confirm that the report ‘does not assume or estimate a causal relationship’ between childhood asthma and natural gas stoves. Organizations that are making these allegations are relying on reports that did not test natural gas stoves and have ignored research that found no association between gas stoves and asthma. For an issue as important and personal as children’s health, sound science matters. A 2022 study by GTI Energy, which actually tested gas and electric stoves in a lab showed no difference in their particulate emissions, but it did show what and how you cook matters.”
“Consumers deserve transparent information about the products they use, and the natural gas industry has been working day and night to make sure they have just that—safe and reliable energy and objective and transparent information about the energy they use. The perpetuation of the allegations in this recent report, which is funded by non-governmental organizations working to advance their agenda to remove consumer energy choice and the option of natural gas, is not only advancing bad science, but is recklessly creating fear for homeowners without cause.
What NWHPBA Will Be Working On In 2023
January 03, 2023
- In Washington State we will be working as an active part of a coalition to regain the ability to have natural gas in homes and commercial construction. This will include both proactive language to remove restrictions created by the state building code in addition to defeating bills that would ban the use of natural gas in new construction.
- NWHPBA will also be working to focus the monies in the current Woodstove Changeout program to ensure they are spent on non-electric (wood, gas and propane) fueled appliances to truly help replace older woodstoves. Monies for home electrification area available through other programs.
- NWHPBA will the leading group to fight any legislation moving woodstove standards below the current EPA standards.
- In all the NWHPBA states we will be monitoring legislation to ensure that additional licensing restrictions are not put on the installation of products sold by our retailers. In particular, we will be watching electrification efforts by unions to restrict installations of certain programs to only certain electrician types.
Washington State Building Code Council to Vote on Final Residential & Commercial Energy Code Proposals on November 4th
November 03, 2022
The Washington State Building Code Council is poised to do final votes on the adoption of the residential and commercial energy code proposals on November 4th. After the votes at this meeting, the adopted proposals will sit through a state legislative session before going into effect on July 1, 2023.
NWHPBA has been working on these proposals since they were initially proposed, arguing the need for gas to remain an option for supplemental heating. The threat to the availability of gas is through proposals that would incentivize the use of electric-only heat pumps and heat pump water heaters. The commercial code requires electric only, and the residential code allows gas appliances but then disincentivizes the use of these appliances through the credit options tables. These are the credits builders must acquire in the energy code in order to receive their permits to build.
NWHPBA members testified and sent in written comments. NWHPBA has submitted testimony as well and has been active with many other groups, including utilities, builders, and consumer groups who have been working to ensure gas can still be provided affordably to homes. There is nothing in the code that prohibits gas or propane fireplaces but the cost of running natural gas lines to new homes will create a situation where builders cannot afford to run these gas lines over time. If gas is already available, a fireplace can be installed.
According to the State Building Code Council, no more public comment will be taken on these codes. Our message is in, we just have to hope it has been heard. We do have several allies on the council who will be doing their best to fight the worst of the proposals. Several motions will be made to change proposals, including explicitly allowing high-efficiency gas heat pumps and heat pump water heaters to maintain the ability to run gas lines to homes.
After that, we go to the Legislature with bills to repeal or at least make sure natural gas is available to homes. This is where grassroots will be needed. In addition, two legal tracks are developing. We may find an opportunity to help with a union/contractor group that is developing a legal plan.
YOUR NATURAL GAS APPLIANCE BUSINESS IS AT RISK!
October 04, 2022
|
TAKE ACTION THIS WEEK TO STOP ATTEMPTS TO BAN NATURAL GAS
AND SAVE YOUR BUSINESS! The Washington State Building Code Council is holding a hearing on October 14th on the new Residential Energy and Building Code Proposals.
These proposals:
These extra costs will further hurt a homeowner’s ability to put supplemental and decorative hearth appliances into their new homes. HELP NWHPBA BY MAKING YOUR VOICE HEARD!
The hearing is going to be held Friday, October 14, 2022 from 10 AM – 5 PM.
The location of the hearing is: Location: Room 1213, 1500 Jefferson St SE; Olympia, WA 98504
What you can do!
You must submit a sign-up form to testify before the hearing date.
The sooner you sign up, the earlier you will be able to testify.
You must submit written testimony by 5 p.m. on Oct. 14, 2022.
KEY HEARTH INDUSTRY TALKING POINTS FOR TESTIMONY
AND WRITTEN COMMENTS
Insufficient, lacking or inaccurate cost data means this code is being put together without objective information regarding the impact on consumers, housing costs, and the businesses that build houses – including the hearth products industry. Supplemental heating in Washington State homes is essential. According to a 2019 study from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, four times as many people were killed from cold temperatures than from warm temperatures. While the focus of the energy code is on electrification and cooling via heat pumps, the council is ignoring the need to ensure resilient heating systems in our homes. Climate change may bring warmer temperatures in the summer, but the reality in the Northwest could still be significant fall and winter storms that knock out power to homes during cold months. Pressure on the electric grid, along with the demand from other states such as California for increased power, will put homes in Washington state in jeopardy of power outages – not when it is warm, but when it is colder. Residents in Washington utilize more electricity during cold weather events. Our building code should not disincentivize clean burning backup options such as natural gas fireplaces.
The proposed energy code currently disincentivizes natural gas through the credit options table and the need for builders to achieve a certain number of energy credits. This will result in fewer houses being built with ANY ability to have natural gas run to the home. This will not only reduce the number of gas fireplaces installed in homes originally, it will also reduce the choices for residents who want to add a supplemental heat option after their house is built – an action that is a reality after power outages occur.
|
IT’S TIME TO HELP LAWMAKERS GET TO KNOW YOUR BUSINESS!
June 14, 2022
In government affairs, we spend a lot of time telling business owners to get to know their lawmakers. But, we also need those lawmakers to get to know your business. The best way to do that is to invite them to your business. Let them see what you do. Let them meet your employees. This helps them better understand why you are concerned about issues when they come up in the state Legislature or in Congress. And it is the best way them to remember you and the hearth industry.
Take a couple minutes to watch this video and learn more about the benefits of bringing lawmakers into your business — and how easy it is too!
Proposal to Require All-Electric Home Construction Based on Outdated and Inaccurate Information
Article from Washington Policy Center
By Todd Myers
Originally Posted June 2, 2022 | Updated June 8, 2022
The Washington State Building Code Council (SBCC) is considering a ban on natural gas for residential construction. The proposal would “require new residential buildings to be built to be all-electric.” The members of the council are relying in part on an analysis done for the SBCC by the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) and the New Buildings Institute.
RMI was kind enough to share their updated cost analysis of the proposal. That transparency is really welcome and, in my experience, typical of the way RMI works – they are advocates for their position but are transparent about their analysis and arguments.
That analysis, however, has changed significantly from what was sent to SBCC members. The updated numbers from RMI themselves show requiring residential construction to be all-electric would increase homeowner costs.
Additionally, RMI’s assumptions for energy costs are outdated. Using updated cost estimates shows that over the next decade while electricity rates increase, natural gas costs will actually decline – the opposite of the outdated projections cited by the initial projections.
The primary justification for the proposed requirement is the claim that banning natural gas would “improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” The assumptions behind this claim are badly out of date and updated information indicates adoption of the code would do nothing to reduce CO2 emission.
In sum, these changes and inaccuracies show the policy would add costs to home ownership while doing nothing to reduce statewide CO2 emissions.
The combination of these changes and the dramatic change in the data indicate the SBCC should step back and reconsider the proposal.
Four elements of the analysis are worth noting.
New Estimates Show Construction Costs for Electrification Increases Costs
The Rocky Mountain Institute has updated the Life Cycle Costs (LCC) of the proposal and the previously claimed savings have turned into increased costs. In the packet provided to the SBCC, the proposal claims there is “no impact on housing affordability since this will actually save builders money.” The new data show the opposite.
For construction in Seattle, the new data show that construction costs are $6,763.84 for a home with a natural gas furnace and air conditioning, and $3,402.84 without air conditioning. For an all-electric home, the construction cost is $6,847, adding between $3,400 and $83 to construction costs. The analysis for Spokane is similar.
The remaining life-cycle savings are now entirely dependent on reduced utility costs. These estimates, however, are out of date and updated information turns these claimed savings into costs.
Updated Utility Cost Projections Turn Savings into Costs
The advocates of the regulation claim “World Bank long term forecasts indicate an increase of over 80% in gas prices over the coming decade.” The Life Cycle Calculation tool provided by OFM uses cost estimates from the Federal Life Cycle Costing 
Manual. It indicates that by 2029, natural gas prices will increase 13 percent and electricity costs will increase only two percent.
The most recent data from that manual, however, has very different projections. It estimates electricity costs will increase only one percent but natural gas costs will actually fall by 7 percent.
Additionally, in the long-term, the new numbers assume electricity costs will go up, while the old projection assumed electricity costs would decline. The new projection for natural gas, in the long run, is that costs would increase 14 percent in 2051, far lower than the old estimate of a 41 percent increase.
Using the new numbers dramatically reduces the potential savings. Using the old numbers, the electrification alternative saves $1,922 over the 50-year analysis timeline. Using the new numbers, the electrification alternative costs $303 more than using gas.
Using the RMI’s updated construction data and the new energy cost projections from the federal government shows the requirement to build all-electric would increase costs both for construction and utilities.
Flawed CO2 Emissions Estimates
Despite those increased costs, proponents may still argue that the regulations are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions, reducing the potential damage done by climate change. Here also the estimates used by RMI are inaccurate.
The reference case used in the report says residential CO2 emissions in 2020 amount to 11.4 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2. This estimate is used to calculate the potential reduction in CO2 emissions from the new rule.
According to the Washington State Department of Ecology, the actual amount included in their 2018 emissions report (the most recent available) is 4.8 MMT CO2. Of the state’s 98.5 MMT CO2 emissions, only 6 percent are from residential sources, and 4.9 percent of the state total is from residential natural gas.
The estimate included in the proposal is that electrification would reduce CO2 emissions by about 6 MMT in 2050. This seems unlikely since the current amount of natural gas-related emissions is a quarter less than the total projected savings.
By increasing the potential emissions reductions, the proposal exaggerates the potential reductions.
Proposed Restrictions Would Add Nothing to Total CO2 reductions
Even those exaggerated reductions are inaccurate. The report outlines the assumptions about total CO2 emissions in the reference case compared to banning natural gas and going to full electrification. These estimates come from the Washington State Energy Strategy Decarbonization report, released in December 2020.
Since that time, the state adopted a strict CO2 cap which requires state CO2 emissions to be cut in half by 2030 and reach 95% below 1990 levels by 2050. The levels assumed in the reference case are now illegal and the proposed building requirements don’t change those targets, they only dictate how they must be met.
Put more simply, this new rule does nothing to reduce CO2 emissions above what is already legally required. If these new requirements are not adopted, it will make no difference in Washington’s total emissions.
It can be claimed that requiring electrification of buildings would smooth that required transition, but the claimed CO2 reductions go away because the reference case is out of date. In RMI’s revised assessment, CO2 reduction accounts for between $7,000 and $11,500 of the claimed lifetime savings. Using current law, those savings are actually zero.
The proposal to require all-electric residential construction was based on two claims that are both out of date. First, that it would reduce the cost of construction and home ownership. The updated data from RMI and the federal government show that is inaccurate. Second, it is argued that these restrictions are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions. That is based on the 2020 policy environment. Since then, Washington has adopted a CO2 cap, making the baseline emissions assumptions inaccurate and illegal. In light of these significant changes, the members of the SBCC should table this proposal, if only to better understand the new data.
Update
The Technical Advisory Group to the State Building Code Council voted to adopt two proposals to require electric water and space heating (with some allowances). There were several last-minute changes to the proposal as well as the life-cycle analysis. As a result, the impacts of the policy voted on by the advisory group are unclear, although the new estimates indicated it would increase construction costs. Despite the lack of clarity and the new information contradicting the claims in the written proposal that it would not impact housing affordability, the rules were adopted. Now the proposals move on to the full State Building Code Council later this year.
CALL TO ACTION: Nominate Our Leaders!
May 13, 2022
Interested in participating in our decision-making? Nominate yourself today!
This is a great way to be involved to fight legislative issues and learn another side to your industry that is fun and exciting. Work with peers from four different states.
Minimal time commitment, as we meet only 4-6 times per year. Nominate yourself or a colleague by Friday, June 10th.
Board Positions Available
- 4 At-Large Positions
- 1 Idaho Position
- 1 Montana Position
- 1 Western Washington Position
2-year term (2022 – 2024). All paid 2022 members are eligible to vote.
Please email your nominations to: [email protected].
Great News! Governor to Appoint BIAW and AGC Nominees to State Building Code Council
April 7, 2022
Governor Will Also Pay $70,000 to Settle Records Suit
Under a legal settlement announced today, the two members of the Building Code Council the governor appointed to represent the residential and commercial building industries will resign. Then the governor must replace them with nominees from BIAW and AGC. The governor’s office must also pay BIAW $70,000 in connection with a separate Public Records Act lawsuit.
“This is a tremendous victory for the members of our association, for protecting the cost of housing and for holding elected officials accountable to following the law,” said BIAW Executive VP Greg Lane.
“The Building Code Council makes critical decisions that impact hundreds of thousands of homeowners and businesses. The law was rightfully designed to ensure industries like residential construction, that are directly affected by the code, have a seat at the table when changes are considered.”
Help Stop Unnecessary, Onerous, and Costly Ergonomics Rules on Business
February 22, 2022
HB 1837 would allow the Department of Labor and Industries to impose costly, complicated, and unnecessary regulations on all employers by overturning voter-approved Initiative 841.
Prior to the passage of Initiative 841, The Department of Labor & Industries adopted an 18-page confusing rule that required all employers to identify jobs that pose ergonomic hazards and then do whatever is “technologically and economically feasible” to eliminate those hazards. The “concise explanatory statement” for the rule was 126 pages long and the rules were anticipated to cost employers $725 million back in the early 2000s. That number would be over $1 billion in today’s dollars.
HB 1837, by repealing the initiative, paves the way for L&I to start regulating businesses on this issue again. We need to have all businesses sign in OPPOSED at the hearing on Wednesday and email their legislators to stop this bill from moving.
TODAY: Please sign in “CON”, opposing HB 1837 at Wednesday’s hearing in the Senate. (You must do this before 9:00 AM on Wednesday, February 25, 2022)
Then contact your State Senator to send them an email to OPPOSE HB 1837. Washington’s businesses cannot afford more rules!
Contact State Senator | State Senator Not Listed?
- Employers are already struggling with workforce and supply chain issues. Ergonomics regulations will make these situations worse.
- Ergonomics regulations will cost employers billions and lead to more automation.
- There is no consensus in the medical community on the causes and cures of repetitive motion injuries – individuals all have different risks.
- Ergonomics regulations will exacerbate our worker shortage, particularly in some of our most essential workplaces, by limiting how many hours employees can legally work.
- The Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that despite the passage of Initiative 841 (which prohibited L&I from adopting ergonomics rules), the Department can still require employers to address workplace musculoskeletal disorders (ergonomics) – thus employees are already protected.
- Businesses around the state are still trying to recover from the response to the pandemic. Ergonomics rules will be the nail in the coffin for many.
Thank You for Taking Action Today!
Breaking News Bulletin
February 18, 2022
Masks No Longer Required in Most Places Beginning March 21
COVID-19 Trends Give Leaders Confidence to Look Towards Next Phase of Pandemic Response
“Vaccination remains our most essential protection against severe illness and death from COVID-19. It’s also crucial to prevent our hospitals from being overwhelmed again,” Inslee said. “If you’ve been procrastinating, now is the time to join the more than 80% of eligible Washingtonians who have gotten at least one shot.”
Guidance for K-12 Schools Will Be Updated
“Our students, educators and school employees, and families have been incredibly resilient as we’ve navigated the impacts of the pandemic,” said Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal. “Our efforts over the past two years have led us to this moment. Nearly all of our school employees are vaccinated, the number of vaccinated students increases each day, and we have one of the most robust COVID-19 school testing programs in the country. Moving away from a statewide mask mandate to masks being encouraged is a safe next step as we move from pandemic to endemic.”
Employers Must Continue Adhering to Safe Workplace Protocols
COVID-19 remains a recognized workplace hazard. When masks are no longer required in the workplace, employers must continue taking steps to assess COVID-19 transmission risks to employees and taking steps to minimize those risks. Risks vary depending on the workspace and conditions. Possible steps could include promoting vaccination, improving ventilation, offering face masks, encouraging social distancing or installing sneeze guards or barriers.
Employers are still required to notify workers of potential exposures when a co-worker has a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19, and, in worksites with 50 or more employees, report outbreaks of 10 or more confirmed cases to the state Department of Labor & Industries.
Employers must also allow workers to continue to wear masks if they choose. In 2021, the Legislature passed SSB 5254, which protects a worker’s right to wear a face covering and other protective devices during a public health emergency. The governor is amending an existing worker safety and protection emergency order, Proclamation 21-08, to reflect this new state law. Proclamation 21-08 already prohibits employers from taking adverse action against a worker for taking COVID-related health actions, including getting vaccinated and taking time off to get vaccinated or seek treatment, and it will now also protect workers from any adverse action for wearing a face covering while we remain in a state of emergency.
“Caution, Compassion and Kindness is What Will Allow Us to Move Forward, Together”
While the transition to the next phase of the pandemic is reason for hope, Inslee emphasized that many families and individuals will continue taking precautions such as wearing face masks at school and work.
URGENT – SIGN IN TO OPPOSE ESHB 1770!
February 16, 2022
REGARDING ENERGY CODES TODAY!
It’s time to do it again! We need to show OPPOSITION for SHB 1770, the bill that would increase the requirements of our state energy code. This bill not only requires all homes to be net zero ready by 2034, it also focuses on greenhouse gas emission reductions rather than energy efficiency which changes the dynamics of the state energy code.
The biggest thing this bill does is create a statewide residential “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments can adopt. This would create confusion by having local governments with codes that are different than the state energy code.
SHB 1770 will increase the costs of housing by thousands of dollars and wreak havoc with the labor and supply chains when it comes to heating and cooling options for housing. In addition, since it moves the energy code further away from natural gas, options for secondary heating and energy efficient appliances will be eliminated for homeowners.
YOUR ACTIONS ARE WORKING! So far, your actions have led to the defeat of two of the four “building decarbonization” bills that are threatening this industry. We can’t let our guard down now.
You must sign in BEFORE 9 AM tomorrow to be counted on the record.
THANK YOU AND KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
Sign In Opposing ESHB 1770 | View Full Bill
URGENT – CALL YOUR LEGISLATORS TODAY!
February 11, 2022
TELL THEM TO OPPOSE SHB 1770 – WHICH WILL MAKE WASHINGTON STATE’S ENERGY CODE EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE AND DIFFICULT.
The Washington State House of Representatives is poised to take a vote on SHB 1770 – strengthening energy codes. This bill makes significant changes to the existing state energy code. It changes the goal from one of “energy efficiency” to greenhouse gas emission reductions. This will force all new residential buildings to full electrification – regardless of whether or not non-electric appliances would be more affordable and energy-efficient. It also creates a “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments could adopt – which would be more stringent and restrictive than the state energy code.
Why OPPOSE SHB 1770:
- It would be devastating to housing affordability in Washington State – increasing the cost of building a home by thousands of dollars – particularly if homes are required to be “net zero ready” or “solar ready” as is demanded by this bill.
- It would encourage the banning of natural gas connections – particularly through the local reach code – putting millions of Washingtonians at risk when power outages occur because they would not have a secondary heating or cooking resource and reducing the ability to choose the most efficient, affordable energy source for their home.
- It exacerbates the labor shortage. Requiring builders to make all houses “net zero ready” and to be “solar ready” will require more electricians than are available now. In addition, current laws actually keep specialty electricians from doing some of the needed work which means fewer available workers, more delays and more cost.
- It exacerbates the supply chain issue – Washington state builders and contractors are already limited in what they can use in residential construction because of our existing strict energy code (which just went into effect during the pandemic). This would put even more product out of reach for Washington builders – -increasing costs and delays and disrupting attempts to build affordable housing.
LEGISLATORS NEED TO SET THIS BILL DOWN. OUR CURRENT STATE ENERGY CODE ALREADY IS WORKING TOWARD VERY STRINGENT GOALS THAT WILL HELP CLIMATE CHANGE. LET THE CURRENT PROCESS WORK AND DO NOT ADD NEW GOALS OR REQUIREMENTS THAT INCREASE THE COST OF HOUSING, LEAD TO BANS ON NATURAL GAS, AND EXACERBATE THE SUPPLY CHAIN! WASHINGTON CITIZENS CAN NOT AFFORD THIS BILL!
CONTACT YOUR TWO STATE REPRESENTATIVES TODAY! TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON SHB 1770 TO PRESERVE JOBS AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING!
To Contact your Two-State Reps – follow this link to FIND YOUR DISTRICT and identify your two representatives. Then go to this link to FIND THEIR EMAIL AND PHONE NUMBER so you can contact them directly.
URGENT – YOUR ACTION NEEDED NOW!! KEY HEARING ON FRIDAY
January 11, 2022
ACTION REQUESTED: THE HEARTH INDUSTRY IN WASHINGTON STATE NEEDS TO GET INVOLVED NOW!
TAKE ACTION: Use this form* to indicate that you are OPPOSED to the bill. Select CON from the first dropdown.
SUBMIT YOUR POSITION. CLICK HERE >>> SIGN IN OPPOSED, NO TESTIMONY
*Be sure to select CON from the first dropdown to indicate your position.
We need to get as many people as possible in the industry to SIGN IN OPPOSED to the bill.
It’s week one of the Washington State Legislature and we already have almost 1,000 bills introduced for the 60-day session. One of the bills is a major threat to the hearth industry (to both wood and gas) and will be discussed at a hearing THIS FRIDAY.
HB 1767 is the “Targeted Electrification Bill” which requires utilities (including gas utilities) to make plans to move people away from fossil fuel-burning appliances. It has a hearing in the House Environment and Energy Committee from 10 AM-12 PM this Friday, January 14th!
“Targeted Electrification” is defined as: the conversion to electricity from fossil fuel or wood of an energy end-use or energy source in a way that provides a net benefit to the utility as determined consistent with subsection (3) of this section.
This definition would have utilities not only working to move customers away from gas appliances but also wood appliances.
THIS IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THE HEARTH INDUSTRY! Not only will it be used to eliminate gas appliances as a primary or secondary heating source, but it also potentially could bring the elimination of woodstoves as a primary or secondary heating source.
WAGE & HOUR BULLETIN: L&I Webinars Can Help You Understand Washington’s Wage & Hour Laws
January 4, 2022
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries’ (L&I) Employment Standards Program is hosting 20 webinars early in 2022 to help employers and workers understand Washington’s wage and hour laws.
The webinar topics include protections for isolated workers, overtime exemptions for white-collar workers, and requirements under the Equal Pay and Opportunities Act. There are also webinars available in English and Spanish that explain the new agricultural overtime law that took effect on January 1, 2022. The program also offers webinars that provide an overview of minimum wage, overtime, paid sick leave, and other workplace rights regulations.
To find the times and to register for any of these webinars, go to L&I’s Workshops & Training web page and search for the webinar by its title in the “Event Title” drop-down menu.
First Quarter of 2022 Webinar Schedule:
January:
5 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
11 – Isolated Worker Protections
12 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
19 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
20 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
25 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
26 – Know Your Worker Rights
February:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
In8 – Isolated Worker Protections
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
22 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
March:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
29 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
Interpretation Services
L&I can provide interpretation services for these sessions at no cost to you when you request them ahead of time. Send an email to [email protected] to request these services.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact Employment Standards Program at their website, by phone, or by email.
Important Update Regarding Washington’s Long-Term Care Program & Collection of Employee Premiums
December 30, 2021
Over the last two weeks, we have reached out to the Governor’s Office and Employment Security Department to advocate for the important change to the rule. Unfortunately, neither the governor nor the agency has immediate plans to revise the rule. As a result, the existing rule, with its employer liability, remains the law.
- (2) When an employer is found by the department to be noncompliant with collecting premiums from an employee, the employer must file an amended report and pay the past due premiums.
Without a change in the rule, the employers’ liability still exists, despite public statements by policy makers.
WA Cares Fund Premium Delayed
December 17, 2021
In case you missed it: Gov. Jay Inslee, together with Senate Majority Leader Andy Billig and House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, released the following statements this morning on delaying the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment:
“I have been in ongoing discussions with legislators about the long-term care bill, which is set to begin collecting funds in January. This bill will help provide much-needed care and coverage for Washingtonians as they age. However, legislators have identified some areas that need adjustments and I agree. We need to give legislators the opportunity to make refinements to the bill. Therefore, I am taking measures within my authority and ordering the state Employment Security Department not to collect the premiums from this program from employers before they come due in April. My actions mean that the state will not collect those funds until the Legislature sorts through these issues. While legislation is under consideration to pause the withholding of LTC fees, employers will not be subject to penalties and interest for not withholding fees from employees’ wages during this transition.” – Gov. Jay Inslee
“The Legislature passed the Long-Term Services and Supports Act, now known as the Washington Cares Fund, in 2019 to ensure the people of Washington have a convenient, cost-effective long-term care option they can rely on without bankrupting them or denying them coverage for pre-existing conditions. The legislature has the opportunity to delay the Cares Fund premium assessment this year in order to make improvements to the Fund during the 2022 legislative session and we fully intend to do so. Pausing the program so that it can better serve disabled veterans, military spouses, non-residents, and near retirees will improve the program. A pause will also give the Long-Term Care Commission the ability to study and make recommendations about residents who move out of Washington to retire and assure that those who have opted out of the program maintain their private insurance policies. These improvements will provide security and stability now and into the future for this critical safety net for our state’s seniors and people with disabilities.
“Delaying implementation of the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment through the 2023 legislative session allows the Legislature time to pass the policy reforms that are ready to go now and to consider further recommendations from the Long-Term Care Commission.
“In addition to delaying the premium assessment, we also support employers pausing premium collections from employees in Washington so lawmakers can take necessary action. While we cannot direct employers not to collect, we strongly encourage them to pause on collecting premiums from employees, giving us time to pass legislation extending implementation dates until next year. We know that this extra time will allow us to find solutions and craft updates to the Fund that allows Washingtonians to age with dignity in their own homes.” – Sen. Andy Billig and Speaker Laurie Jinkins.
Successful Factory Tours Come to a Close
December 3, 2021
NWHPBA and HPBA manufacturers opened their doors this year to legislators from Idaho and Washington. These tours, originally done to showcase the work our manufacturers have done in creating clean-burning woodstoves to meet new EPA NSPS guidelines, also helped educate legislators about an important industry creating jobs in their district.
Kuma, IHP, Travis, and Blaze King all hosted their district legislators. Legislators received a tour of the factories, met employees, and learned about the nuances of manufacturing woodstoves (and gas appliances too). All of the manufacturers emphasized the differences between cordwood and crib testing methods and what the controversy around those testing methods meant for their industry.
All of the legislators involved are willing now to engage in woodstove policy discussions. They all appreciated learning what is involved and how wood and gas heating appliances not only provide beneficial heat for people in their districts but also how the hearth industry is providing needed jobs and benefits.
A summary video has been completed for each tour to help other NWHPBA and HPBA members see what is involved and how bringing legislators to your business can help bring our advocacy efforts to a new level. You can see these videos below.
We encourage all retailers and manufacturers to invite local legislators in to see what you do, visit with your employees, and understand the importance of the industry to your community. For assistance in setting up a legislative visit, please contact Carolyn Logue at [email protected].
Lawsuit Filed Against Washington’s Long-Term Care Program, WA Cares Fund
November 11, 2021
Article from The Seattle Times by Rachel La Corte
Written November 9, 2021 | Updated November 10, 2021
OLYMPIA – Opponents of a mandatory payroll tax to fund Washington state’s new long-term care program filed a lawsuit Tuesday in federal court seeking to stop the January start of the payroll premium for most employees in the state.
The suit filed with the federal court for the Western District of Washington, was filed on behalf of three businesses in the state and six individuals. None of the individuals purchased a private, long-term care insurance plan before Nov. 1, the deadline to qualify for an exemption.
Under the program, WA Cares Fund, workers will pay .58% of total pay per paycheck, meaning an employee with a salary of $50,000 will pay $290 a year. Starting
Jan. 1, 2025, people who need help with assistance with at least three “activities of daily living” such as bathing, dressing or administration of medication, can tap into the fund to pay for things like in-home care, home modifications like a wheelchair ramp and rides to the doctor.
The benefit will also cover home-delivered meals and reimbursement to unpaid family caregivers. The lifetime maximum of the benefit is $36,500, with annual increases to be determined based on inflation.
“The state simply does not have the power to mandate an employee benefit,” Richard Birmingham, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, said in a written statement announcing the lawsuit.
As of Nov. 4, the Employment Security Department had received more than 344,000 applications for an exemption, and just over 140,000 had been approved. Last week, agency spokesman Nick Demerice said that people seeking an exemption are being told that as long as they submit their exemption request by Dec. 1, ESD is guaranteeing that it will be processed it before the end of December.
Even though a private policy had to be purchased before Nov. 1 to opt out, people have until Dec. 31, 2022, to apply for an exemption — which means they may pay a year of the premium unless they opt out before the payroll deduction starts. No rebates are offered for any premiums already paid, and once a person receives an exemption, they are not able to opt back into the state program, even if they change jobs.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Jay Inslee said the office had not yet seen the lawsuit. Officials at the Employment Security Department and the Department of Social and Health Services, also named in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
According to AARP of Washington, 70% of residents 65 and older will require some type of assistance to live independently.
To be eligible for the state benefits, workers will have had to have paid the premium working at least 500 hours per year for three of the previous six years in which they’re seeking the benefit or for a total of 10 years, with at least five of those paid without interruption. The benefit is not portable, so people who pay into the program but later move out of state will not be able to access it, and it only covers the taxpayer, not a spouse or dependent. The benefit also isn’t available to those who work in Washington and will pay the deduction but live in neighboring states, like Oregon.
One of the named plaintiffs, Melissa Johnston, lives in Eagle Point, and works in Vancouver, Washington, and said in a written statement that she has no plan to retire in Washington.
“And yet the state is requiring that I buy a long-term care insurance product that can only be used if I retire in Washington—it just doesn’t make any sense,” she wrote.
Among the arguments made by the suit is that the WA Cares Fund violates a federal law that forbids the state from passing any law that requires employees to participate in a plan that provides sickness or medical benefits. It also says that the disparate treatment of people paying the tax but not receiving benefits if they are not a Washington resident violates the Equal Protection and the Privileges and Immunities clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
Additionally, the fact that people who are within 10 years of retirement will pay into the fund but not receive benefits is a violation of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, the suit contends.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – L&I Considers Contractor Registration Fee Increases
November 2, 2021
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) is considering raising the fee to register, renew or be reinstated as a contractor by 5.79%. The amount of the increase is the state Office of Financial Management’s maximum allowable fiscal growth factor rate for fiscal year 2022.
The increase is needed to ensure the Contractor Registration program remains consistent with fee increases required by statute and to help improve the program’s fund balance.
L&I is required to charge a fee for issuing or renewing a certificate of registration and to revise the fee at least once every two years in recognition of economic changes as reflected by the fiscal growth factor under chapter 43.135 RCW.
The current fee for a certificate of registration is $117.90. The certificate of registration lasts for two years.
The fee increase would affect WAC 296-200A-900, What fees does the department charge contractors for issuance, renewal, reregistration, and reinstatement of certificates of registration?
The agency filed a Preproposal Statement of Inquiry (CR-101) about the fee increase on October 19, 2021.
Opportunities to Comment:
There will be opportunities to provide written comments or present testimony at public hearings. You can find information about this rulemaking by going online to the agency’s “Rulemaking Activity” page.
If adopted, the new fees would take effect April 22, 2022.
Here’s What Happens Next:
- October 19, 2021: Pre-proposal (CR-101) filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- December 21, 2021: The Proposed rules (CR-102) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser
- January 26, 2022: A public hearing on the proposed rules is tentatively scheduled.
- March 22, 2022: The final rules (CR-103) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- April 22, 2022: The new rules are expected to take effect.
L&I may be considering additional fiscal growth factor fee increases for Contractor Registration for fiscal years 2023 and 2024. We will have more information as these possible rulemakings move forward.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Melissa McBride at [email protected], or call 360-902-5731. L&I Newsroom.
The Federal Government Makes It Official: It Will Cost More to Heat This Winter in Most Regions
October 13, 2021
Article by John Crouch, Director, Public Affairs, HPBA
Anyone who has purchased gasoline recently already suspects that energy may cost more this winter, but some families, in some parts of the country, may be in for a really big surprise. On October 13th the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) released their annual report known as the Winter Fuels Outlook. In this assessment, EIA calculates home heating costs for four regions of the U.S., and the five major fuels used, based on the most recent weather and energy price data.
One of the most striking items in this report is that virtually all households in the U.S. will see an increase in heating costs, based on the combination of higher energy prices, and forecasts of a colder winter that last year.
Families that heat with oil will see an average increase in expenditures of 43% over last year. While households that heat with natural gas will see an average national increase of 30% in expenditures, those in the Midwest will see an increase of 48%, followed by western families with an increase of 23 %. Even families in the south, that heat with propane, will see a 43% increase in winter heating costs. All the details can be found in the EIA report.
This report makes no assumptions about power outages, which are increasingly common in many areas, as we saw in Oregon and Texas last February. HPBA members know it has always paid to have a secondary source of heat, to provide security and create options to balance out price spikes. In Texas, Todd Harkrider, a fireplace retailer, noted: “most of our customers stayed nice and cozy inside their homes despite the electrical outage last winter, using their gas fireplaces for heat and cooking on their gas stoves. Some told me they were the most popular house in the neighborhood since they were the only place with heat.”
In Colorado, Lesley Short, owner of Lehrer’s Fireplace shops in Denver, adds, “If you’ve lived in Colorado very long, you know that blizzards can knock out our power, which is why lots of folks have either a gas fireplace, or an EPA-certified wood insert to keep warm, not to mention an outdoor grill for emergency cooking.”
The annual report from EIA is an early warning for what consumers are going to face this year. Our hope is this encourages consumers to think about a secondary source of heat – something our retailers know all about.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – For 2022, Washington Minimum Wage Rises to $14.49 Per Hour
Sept. 30, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) announced Wednesday the state’s minimum wage will rise to $14.49 per hour starting Jan. 1, 2022.
State law mandates L&I calculate the minimum wage for the coming year based on the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). L&I compares the CPI-W from August of the previous year to the index for August of the current year to make the calculation.
The result is the state’s current minimum wage of $13.69 will go up 5.83 percent next year. BLS attributed the increase in the price index to more expensive gas, housing, household furnishings, and food.
The state minimum wage applies to workers age 16 and older. Under state law, employers can pay 85 percent of the minimum wage to workers ages 14-15. For 2022, the wage for that younger group will be $12.32 per hour.
Cities are able to set minimum wages higher than the state’s, and both Seattle and Sea-Tac have higher wages.
For Overtime Exempt Employees:
The change in the minimum wage also means an increase in the minimum salary an employee must earn in 2022 to be overtime exempt. This impacts “white collar” positions held by executive, administrative, and professional workers plus computer professionals and outside salespeople.
Under the state’s rules governing exemptions to the Minimum Wage Act, salaried exempt employees must earn at least a minimum salary that is established as a multiplier of the minimum wage. Therefore, when the minimum wage increases, so does the salary threshold.
Those rules were updated in 2020. L&I created an eight-year implementation schedule that incrementally raises the multiplier until it reaches 2.5 times in 2028. The pace of the increase is based on the size of the employer.
For 2022, to be exempt from overtime, an employee must earn at least $1,014.30 a week ($52,743.60 a year), or 1.75 times the minimum wage.
Computer professionals who are paid by the hour have a different threshold. The new minimums are a part of changes to the overtime rules that took effect July 1, 2020.
The minimum wage applies to most jobs, including those in agriculture. In addition, agricultural workers will be eligible to earn overtime after working more than 55 hours per week, beginning Jan. 1, 2022.
L&I enforces the state’s wage-and-hour laws and investigates all wage-payment complaints.
More information about the minimum wage is available on L&I’s website, as are details about overtime, rest breaks, meal periods, and information on how to file a complaint. Employers and workers may also call 360-902-5316 or 1-866-219-7321.
For media information: Matthew Erlich, L&I Public Affairs, 360-902-6508.
L&I Newsroom. Connect with L&I: Facebook and Twitter.
Washington State Quick Legislative Update
September 23, 2021
A number of things are happening of interest:
CALL TO ACTION: STATE BUILDING CODE COUNCIL TO HOLD SPECIAL MEETING TO HEAR COMMENTS ON THE COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE
The State Building Code Council ran out of time last week and did not hear public comments on the commercial energy code proposal. They will be holding another virtual meeting Thursday, September 30, 2021 from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM to take comments.
Three specific proposals are concerning for those who want to maintain energy choice. Proposals 21-GP1-103 and 21-GP1-136 ban the use of fossil fuel heat pumps and water heaters in the commercial code. Proposal 21-GP1-179 requires electrical connections every place there is a fossil fuel appliance – significantly increasing the cost of putting in gas appliances. If these pass in the commercial code, it is more likely they will become part of the residential energy code updates next year.
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO CALL IN OR SEND AN EMAIL TO OPPOSE THESE SPECIFIC PROPOSALS THAT WILL EFFECTIVELY BAN NATURAL GAS IN COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
To send an email opposing Proposals 21-GP1-103, 21-GP1-236 and 21-GP1-179, send to Members of the Washington State Building Council.
Washington State Truck Parking Action Plan Metroquest Survey
September 20, 2021
The Washington State Legislature is seeking feedback from the trucking industry, especially truck drivers, on truck parking issues and strategies as part of a Truck Parking Action Plan for Washington State.
Your firsthand knowledge will help the Legislature better understand the current issues and create strategies to address near and long-term truck parking needs.
Please take a few minutes to complete the survey below and share it within your organization through September 30, 2021.
You can visit the Truck Parking Action Plan website for more information.
Washington State Emergency Heat Exposure Rules Increases Protection for Outdoor Workers
Employers Must Take Additional Precautions to Prevent Heat-Related Illness
July 9, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) filed an emergency rule today to provide increased protection for employees exposed to extreme heat, including those working in agriculture, construction and other outdoor industries. The emergency Outdoor Heat Exposure rule clarifies proactive steps that employers must take to prevent outdoor workers from suffering heat-related illness.
“The heat experienced in our state this year has reached catastrophic levels. The physical risk to individuals is significant, in particular those whose occupations have them outdoors all day,” said Gov. Jay Inslee. “Our state has rules in place to ensure these risks are mitigated, however, the real impacts of climate change have changed conditions since those rules were first written and we are responding.”
The new regulations, which take effect on July 13, are in addition to existing rules. When the temperature is at or above 100 degrees, employers must respond to the extreme heat by:
- Provide water that is cool enough to drink safely;
- Allow and encourage workers to take additional paid preventative cool-down rest to protect from overheating;
- Be prepared by having a written outdoor heat exposure safety program and providing training to employees; and,
- Respond appropriately to any employee with symptoms of heat-related illness.
The emergency rules update existing rules that are in place annually from May through the end of September. The existing rules already require ready access to at least one quart of drinking water per worker per hour, an outdoor heat exposure safety program with training, and an appropriate response to workers who are experiencing heat-related illness symptoms.
L&I will file an official notification for permanent rulemaking. Known as a CR-101, the notification is the first step in the process of updating the existing state Outdoor Heat Exposure Rule established in 2008.
“The recent heat wave is a reminder that extreme temperatures can be a real danger in the workplace. With more hot weather on the way, we’re taking action now,” said L&I Director Joel Sacks. “The emergency rule clarifies existing requirements and outlines commonsense steps employers must take to keep the workers who are responsible for growing our food, paving our roads, and putting up our buildings safe on the job.”
Craig Blackwood, acting assistant director for L&I’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, said the agency is already stepping up awareness and outreach efforts to amplify the existing rules and the tools in place to help employers and workers.
“In most cases, employers are doing the right thing and complying with the current heat stress rules,” said Blackwood. “The emergency rule clarifies the requirements and prompts employers to plan ahead for any further extreme heat waves that may happen this summer. As one of only three states in the nation with an outdoor heat stress rule, we have a good foundation to build on,” he said.
Working outdoors in hot weather is a health hazard that can result in serious medical conditions, including disability or death. Washington has on average 55 workers’ compensation claims per year for heat-related illnesses.
If you work outside, remember to start your workday fully hydrated, drink at least a quart of water every hour, know the early warning signs of heat stress and pay close attention to how you are feeling, and take regular breaks to cool yourself down. If you feel sick, stop working, move to a shaded place if possible, and tell someone so they can help monitor your symptoms or get help.
In the coming months, L&I will gather information from stakeholders to help create an initial draft of the updated Outdoor Heat Exposure rule. Like all permanent rulemaking processes, there will be opportunities for public input during the process.
Visit L&I’s Be Heat Smart web page for additional steps employers can take to protect employees working in hot temperatures.
For media information: Dina Lorraine, L&I Public Affairs, 360-972-4868
Connect with L&I: L&I Newsroom | Facebook | Twitter
What You Should Now About… Washington Coronavirus Response: Economic Resiliency Team – Joint Information Center, Camp Murray
June 3, 2021
View the Response Here or Click Image Below
WA Cares Fund Program Overview: A PowerPoint presentation on the new Long Term Care Act that has a Payroll Tax Going into Effect January 1, 2022.
View Presentation Here or Click Image Below
Masked and Distancing Requirements Are Changing: Key COVID-19 Updates for Fully Vaccinated Workers
May 21, 2021
View Updates Here or Click Flyer Below
Latest News
IT’S TIME TO HELP LAWMAKERS GET TO KNOW YOUR BUSINESS!
June 14, 2022
In government affairs, we spend a lot of time telling business owners to get to know their lawmakers. But, we also need those lawmakers to get to know your business. The best way to do that is to invite them to your business. Let them see what you do. Let them meet your employees. This helps them better understand why you are concerned about issues when they come up in the state Legislature or in Congress. And it is the best way them to remember you and the hearth industry.
Take a couple minutes to watch this video and learn more about the benefits of bringing lawmakers into your business — and how easy it is too!
Proposal to Require All-Electric Home Construction Based on Outdated and Inaccurate Information
Article from Washington Policy Center
By Todd Myers
Originally Posted June 2, 2022 | Updated June 8, 2022
The Washington State Building Code Council (SBCC) is considering a ban on natural gas for residential construction. The proposal would “require new residential buildings to be built to be all-electric.” The members of the council are relying in part on an analysis done for the SBCC by the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) and the New Buildings Institute.
RMI was kind enough to share their updated cost analysis of the proposal. That transparency is really welcome and, in my experience, typical of the way RMI works – they are advocates for their position but are transparent about their analysis and arguments.
That analysis, however, has changed significantly from what was sent to SBCC members. The updated numbers from RMI themselves show requiring residential construction to be all-electric would increase homeowner costs.
Additionally, RMI’s assumptions for energy costs are outdated. Using updated cost estimates shows that over the next decade while electricity rates increase, natural gas costs will actually decline – the opposite of the outdated projections cited by the initial projections.
The primary justification for the proposed requirement is the claim that banning natural gas would “improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” The assumptions behind this claim are badly out of date and updated information indicates adoption of the code would do nothing to reduce CO2 emission.
In sum, these changes and inaccuracies show the policy would add costs to home ownership while doing nothing to reduce statewide CO2 emissions.
The combination of these changes and the dramatic change in the data indicate the SBCC should step back and reconsider the proposal.
Four elements of the analysis are worth noting.
New Estimates Show Construction Costs for Electrification Increases Costs
The Rocky Mountain Institute has updated the Life Cycle Costs (LCC) of the proposal and the previously claimed savings have turned into increased costs. In the packet provided to the SBCC, the proposal claims there is “no impact on housing affordability since this will actually save builders money.” The new data show the opposite.
For construction in Seattle, the new data show that construction costs are $6,763.84 for a home with a natural gas furnace and air conditioning, and $3,402.84 without air conditioning. For an all-electric home, the construction cost is $6,847, adding between $3,400 and $83 to construction costs. The analysis for Spokane is similar.
The remaining life-cycle savings are now entirely dependent on reduced utility costs. These estimates, however, are out of date and updated information turns these claimed savings into costs.
Updated Utility Cost Projections Turn Savings into Costs
The advocates of the regulation claim “World Bank long term forecasts indicate an increase of over 80% in gas prices over the coming decade.” The Life Cycle Calculation tool provided by OFM uses cost estimates from the Federal Life Cycle Costing Manual. It indicates that by 2029, natural gas prices will increase 13 percent and electricity costs will increase only two percent.
The most recent data from that manual, however, has very different projections. It estimates electricity costs will increase only one percent but natural gas costs will actually fall by 7 percent.
Additionally, in the long-term, the new numbers assume electricity costs will go up, while the old projection assumed electricity costs would decline. The new projection for natural gas, in the long run, is that costs would increase 14 percent in 2051, far lower than the old estimate of a 41 percent increase.
Using the new numbers dramatically reduces the potential savings. Using the old numbers, the electrification alternative saves $1,922 over the 50-year analysis timeline. Using the new numbers, the electrification alternative costs $303 more than using gas.
Using the RMI’s updated construction data and the new energy cost projections from the federal government shows the requirement to build all-electric would increase costs both for construction and utilities.
Flawed CO2 Emissions Estimates
Despite those increased costs, proponents may still argue that the regulations are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions, reducing the potential damage done by climate change. Here also the estimates used by RMI are inaccurate.
The reference case used in the report says residential CO2 emissions in 2020 amount to 11.4 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2. This estimate is used to calculate the potential reduction in CO2 emissions from the new rule.
According to the Washington State Department of Ecology, the actual amount included in their 2018 emissions report (the most recent available) is 4.8 MMT CO2. Of the state’s 98.5 MMT CO2 emissions, only 6 percent are from residential sources, and 4.9 percent of the state total is from residential natural gas.
The estimate included in the proposal is that electrification would reduce CO2 emissions by about 6 MMT in 2050. This seems unlikely since the current amount of natural gas-related emissions is a quarter less than the total projected savings.
By increasing the potential emissions reductions, the proposal exaggerates the potential reductions.
Proposed Restrictions Would Add Nothing to Total CO2 reductions
Even those exaggerated reductions are inaccurate. The report outlines the assumptions about total CO2 emissions in the reference case compared to banning natural gas and going to full electrification. These estimates come from the Washington State Energy Strategy Decarbonization report, released in December 2020.
Since that time, the state adopted a strict CO2 cap which requires state CO2 emissions to be cut in half by 2030 and reach 95% below 1990 levels by 2050. The levels assumed in the reference case are now illegal and the proposed building requirements don’t change those targets, they only dictate how they must be met.
Put more simply, this new rule does nothing to reduce CO2 emissions above what is already legally required. If these new requirements are not adopted, it will make no difference in Washington’s total emissions.
It can be claimed that requiring electrification of buildings would smooth that required transition, but the claimed CO2 reductions go away because the reference case is out of date. In RMI’s revised assessment, CO2 reduction accounts for between $7,000 and $11,500 of the claimed lifetime savings. Using current law, those savings are actually zero.
The proposal to require all-electric residential construction was based on two claims that are both out of date. First, that it would reduce the cost of construction and home ownership. The updated data from RMI and the federal government show that is inaccurate. Second, it is argued that these restrictions are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions. That is based on the 2020 policy environment. Since then, Washington has adopted a CO2 cap, making the baseline emissions assumptions inaccurate and illegal. In light of these significant changes, the members of the SBCC should table this proposal, if only to better understand the new data.
Update
The Technical Advisory Group to the State Building Code Council voted to adopt two proposals to require electric water and space heating (with some allowances). There were several last-minute changes to the proposal as well as the life-cycle analysis. As a result, the impacts of the policy voted on by the advisory group are unclear, although the new estimates indicated it would increase construction costs. Despite the lack of clarity and the new information contradicting the claims in the written proposal that it would not impact housing affordability, the rules were adopted. Now the proposals move on to the full State Building Code Council later this year.
CALL TO ACTION: Nominate Our Leaders!
May 13, 2022
Interested in participating in our decision-making? Nominate yourself today!
This is a great way to be involved to fight legislative issues and learn another side to your industry that is fun and exciting. Work with peers from four different states.
Minimal time commitment, as we meet only 4-6 times per year. Nominate yourself or a colleague by Friday, June 10th.
Board Positions Available
- 4 At-Large Positions
- 1 Idaho Position
- 1 Montana Position
- 1 Western Washington Position
2-year term (2022 – 2024). All paid 2022 members are eligible to vote.
Please email your nominations to: [email protected].
Great News! Governor to Appoint BIAW and AGC Nominees to State Building Code Council
April 7, 2022
Governor Will Also Pay $70,000 to Settle Records Suit
Under a legal settlement announced today, the two members of the Building Code Council the governor appointed to represent the residential and commercial building industries will resign. Then the governor must replace them with nominees from BIAW and AGC. The governor’s office must also pay BIAW $70,000 in connection with a separate Public Records Act lawsuit.
“This is a tremendous victory for the members of our association, for protecting the cost of housing and for holding elected officials accountable to following the law,” said BIAW Executive VP Greg Lane.
“The Building Code Council makes critical decisions that impact hundreds of thousands of homeowners and businesses. The law was rightfully designed to ensure industries like residential construction, that are directly affected by the code, have a seat at the table when changes are considered.”
Help Stop Unnecessary, Onerous, and Costly Ergonomics Rules on Business
February 22, 2022
HB 1837 would allow the Department of Labor and Industries to impose costly, complicated, and unnecessary regulations on all employers by overturning voter-approved Initiative 841.
Prior to the passage of Initiative 841, The Department of Labor & Industries adopted an 18-page confusing rule that required all employers to identify jobs that pose ergonomic hazards and then do whatever is “technologically and economically feasible” to eliminate those hazards. The “concise explanatory statement” for the rule was 126 pages long and the rules were anticipated to cost employers $725 million back in the early 2000s. That number would be over $1 billion in today’s dollars.
HB 1837, by repealing the initiative, paves the way for L&I to start regulating businesses on this issue again. We need to have all businesses sign in OPPOSED at the hearing on Wednesday and email their legislators to stop this bill from moving.
TODAY: Please sign in “CON”, opposing HB 1837 at Wednesday’s hearing in the Senate. (You must do this before 9:00 AM on Wednesday, February 25, 2022)
Then contact your State Senator to send them an email to OPPOSE HB 1837. Washington’s businesses cannot afford more rules!
Contact State Senator | State Senator Not Listed?
- Employers are already struggling with workforce and supply chain issues. Ergonomics regulations will make these situations worse.
- Ergonomics regulations will cost employers billions and lead to more automation.
- There is no consensus in the medical community on the causes and cures of repetitive motion injuries – individuals all have different risks.
- Ergonomics regulations will exacerbate our worker shortage, particularly in some of our most essential workplaces, by limiting how many hours employees can legally work.
- The Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that despite the passage of Initiative 841 (which prohibited L&I from adopting ergonomics rules), the Department can still require employers to address workplace musculoskeletal disorders (ergonomics) – thus employees are already protected.
- Businesses around the state are still trying to recover from the response to the pandemic. Ergonomics rules will be the nail in the coffin for many.
Thank You for Taking Action Today!
Breaking News Bulletin
February 18, 2022
Masks No Longer Required in Most Places Beginning March 21
COVID-19 Trends Give Leaders Confidence to Look Towards Next Phase of Pandemic Response
“Vaccination remains our most essential protection against severe illness and death from COVID-19. It’s also crucial to prevent our hospitals from being overwhelmed again,” Inslee said. “If you’ve been procrastinating, now is the time to join the more than 80% of eligible Washingtonians who have gotten at least one shot.”
Guidance for K-12 Schools Will Be Updated
“Our students, educators and school employees, and families have been incredibly resilient as we’ve navigated the impacts of the pandemic,” said Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal. “Our efforts over the past two years have led us to this moment. Nearly all of our school employees are vaccinated, the number of vaccinated students increases each day, and we have one of the most robust COVID-19 school testing programs in the country. Moving away from a statewide mask mandate to masks being encouraged is a safe next step as we move from pandemic to endemic.”
Employers Must Continue Adhering to Safe Workplace Protocols
COVID-19 remains a recognized workplace hazard. When masks are no longer required in the workplace, employers must continue taking steps to assess COVID-19 transmission risks to employees and taking steps to minimize those risks. Risks vary depending on the workspace and conditions. Possible steps could include promoting vaccination, improving ventilation, offering face masks, encouraging social distancing or installing sneeze guards or barriers.
Employers are still required to notify workers of potential exposures when a co-worker has a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19, and, in worksites with 50 or more employees, report outbreaks of 10 or more confirmed cases to the state Department of Labor & Industries.
Employers must also allow workers to continue to wear masks if they choose. In 2021, the Legislature passed SSB 5254, which protects a worker’s right to wear a face covering and other protective devices during a public health emergency. The governor is amending an existing worker safety and protection emergency order, Proclamation 21-08, to reflect this new state law. Proclamation 21-08 already prohibits employers from taking adverse action against a worker for taking COVID-related health actions, including getting vaccinated and taking time off to get vaccinated or seek treatment, and it will now also protect workers from any adverse action for wearing a face covering while we remain in a state of emergency.
“Caution, Compassion and Kindness is What Will Allow Us to Move Forward, Together”
While the transition to the next phase of the pandemic is reason for hope, Inslee emphasized that many families and individuals will continue taking precautions such as wearing face masks at school and work.
URGENT – SIGN IN TO OPPOSE ESHB 1770!
February 16, 2022
REGARDING ENERGY CODES TODAY!
It’s time to do it again! We need to show OPPOSITION for SHB 1770, the bill that would increase the requirements of our state energy code. This bill not only requires all homes to be net zero ready by 2034, it also focuses on greenhouse gas emission reductions rather than energy efficiency which changes the dynamics of the state energy code.
The biggest thing this bill does is create a statewide residential “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments can adopt. This would create confusion by having local governments with codes that are different than the state energy code.
SHB 1770 will increase the costs of housing by thousands of dollars and wreak havoc with the labor and supply chains when it comes to heating and cooling options for housing. In addition, since it moves the energy code further away from natural gas, options for secondary heating and energy efficient appliances will be eliminated for homeowners.
YOUR ACTIONS ARE WORKING! So far, your actions have led to the defeat of two of the four “building decarbonization” bills that are threatening this industry. We can’t let our guard down now.
You must sign in BEFORE 9 AM tomorrow to be counted on the record.
THANK YOU AND KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
Sign In Opposing ESHB 1770 | View Full Bill
URGENT – CALL YOUR LEGISLATORS TODAY!
February 11, 2022
TELL THEM TO OPPOSE SHB 1770 – WHICH WILL MAKE WASHINGTON STATE’S ENERGY CODE EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE AND DIFFICULT.
The Washington State House of Representatives is poised to take a vote on SHB 1770 – strengthening energy codes. This bill makes significant changes to the existing state energy code. It changes the goal from one of “energy efficiency” to greenhouse gas emission reductions. This will force all new residential buildings to full electrification – regardless of whether or not non-electric appliances would be more affordable and energy-efficient. It also creates a “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments could adopt – which would be more stringent and restrictive than the state energy code.
Why OPPOSE SHB 1770:
- It would be devastating to housing affordability in Washington State – increasing the cost of building a home by thousands of dollars – particularly if homes are required to be “net zero ready” or “solar ready” as is demanded by this bill.
- It would encourage the banning of natural gas connections – particularly through the local reach code – putting millions of Washingtonians at risk when power outages occur because they would not have a secondary heating or cooking resource and reducing the ability to choose the most efficient, affordable energy source for their home.
- It exacerbates the labor shortage. Requiring builders to make all houses “net zero ready” and to be “solar ready” will require more electricians than are available now. In addition, current laws actually keep specialty electricians from doing some of the needed work which means fewer available workers, more delays and more cost.
- It exacerbates the supply chain issue – Washington state builders and contractors are already limited in what they can use in residential construction because of our existing strict energy code (which just went into effect during the pandemic). This would put even more product out of reach for Washington builders – -increasing costs and delays and disrupting attempts to build affordable housing.
LEGISLATORS NEED TO SET THIS BILL DOWN. OUR CURRENT STATE ENERGY CODE ALREADY IS WORKING TOWARD VERY STRINGENT GOALS THAT WILL HELP CLIMATE CHANGE. LET THE CURRENT PROCESS WORK AND DO NOT ADD NEW GOALS OR REQUIREMENTS THAT INCREASE THE COST OF HOUSING, LEAD TO BANS ON NATURAL GAS, AND EXACERBATE THE SUPPLY CHAIN! WASHINGTON CITIZENS CAN NOT AFFORD THIS BILL!
CONTACT YOUR TWO STATE REPRESENTATIVES TODAY! TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON SHB 1770 TO PRESERVE JOBS AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING!
To Contact your Two-State Reps – follow this link to FIND YOUR DISTRICT and identify your two representatives. Then go to this link to FIND THEIR EMAIL AND PHONE NUMBER so you can contact them directly.
URGENT – YOUR ACTION NEEDED NOW!! KEY HEARING ON FRIDAY
January 11, 2022
ACTION REQUESTED: THE HEARTH INDUSTRY IN WASHINGTON STATE NEEDS TO GET INVOLVED NOW!
TAKE ACTION: Use this form* to indicate that you are OPPOSED to the bill. Select CON from the first dropdown.
SUBMIT YOUR POSITION. CLICK HERE >>> SIGN IN OPPOSED, NO TESTIMONY
*Be sure to select CON from the first dropdown to indicate your position.
We need to get as many people as possible in the industry to SIGN IN OPPOSED to the bill.
It’s week one of the Washington State Legislature and we already have almost 1,000 bills introduced for the 60-day session. One of the bills is a major threat to the hearth industry (to both wood and gas) and will be discussed at a hearing THIS FRIDAY.
HB 1767 is the “Targeted Electrification Bill” which requires utilities (including gas utilities) to make plans to move people away from fossil fuel-burning appliances. It has a hearing in the House Environment and Energy Committee from 10 AM-12 PM this Friday, January 14th!
“Targeted Electrification” is defined as: the conversion to electricity from fossil fuel or wood of an energy end-use or energy source in a way that provides a net benefit to the utility as determined consistent with subsection (3) of this section.
This definition would have utilities not only working to move customers away from gas appliances but also wood appliances.
THIS IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THE HEARTH INDUSTRY! Not only will it be used to eliminate gas appliances as a primary or secondary heating source, but it also potentially could bring the elimination of woodstoves as a primary or secondary heating source.
WAGE & HOUR BULLETIN: L&I Webinars Can Help You Understand Washington’s Wage & Hour Laws
January 4, 2022
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries’ (L&I) Employment Standards Program is hosting 20 webinars early in 2022 to help employers and workers understand Washington’s wage and hour laws.
The webinar topics include protections for isolated workers, overtime exemptions for white-collar workers, and requirements under the Equal Pay and Opportunities Act. There are also webinars available in English and Spanish that explain the new agricultural overtime law that took effect on January 1, 2022. The program also offers webinars that provide an overview of minimum wage, overtime, paid sick leave, and other workplace rights regulations.
To find the times and to register for any of these webinars, go to L&I’s Workshops & Training web page and search for the webinar by its title in the “Event Title” drop-down menu.
First Quarter of 2022 Webinar Schedule:
January:
5 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
11 – Isolated Worker Protections
12 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
19 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
20 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
25 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
26 – Know Your Worker Rights
February:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
In8 – Isolated Worker Protections
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
22 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
March:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
29 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
Interpretation Services
L&I can provide interpretation services for these sessions at no cost to you when you request them ahead of time. Send an email to [email protected] to request these services.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact Employment Standards Program at their website, by phone, or by email.
Important Update Regarding Washington’s Long-Term Care Program & Collection of Employee Premiums
December 30, 2021
Over the last two weeks, we have reached out to the Governor’s Office and Employment Security Department to advocate for the important change to the rule. Unfortunately, neither the governor nor the agency has immediate plans to revise the rule. As a result, the existing rule, with its employer liability, remains the law.
- (2) When an employer is found by the department to be noncompliant with collecting premiums from an employee, the employer must file an amended report and pay the past due premiums.
Without a change in the rule, the employers’ liability still exists, despite public statements by policy makers.
WA Cares Fund Premium Delayed
December 17, 2021
In case you missed it: Gov. Jay Inslee, together with Senate Majority Leader Andy Billig and House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, released the following statements this morning on delaying the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment:
“I have been in ongoing discussions with legislators about the long-term care bill, which is set to begin collecting funds in January. This bill will help provide much-needed care and coverage for Washingtonians as they age. However, legislators have identified some areas that need adjustments and I agree. We need to give legislators the opportunity to make refinements to the bill. Therefore, I am taking measures within my authority and ordering the state Employment Security Department not to collect the premiums from this program from employers before they come due in April. My actions mean that the state will not collect those funds until the Legislature sorts through these issues. While legislation is under consideration to pause the withholding of LTC fees, employers will not be subject to penalties and interest for not withholding fees from employees’ wages during this transition.” – Gov. Jay Inslee
“The Legislature passed the Long-Term Services and Supports Act, now known as the Washington Cares Fund, in 2019 to ensure the people of Washington have a convenient, cost-effective long-term care option they can rely on without bankrupting them or denying them coverage for pre-existing conditions. The legislature has the opportunity to delay the Cares Fund premium assessment this year in order to make improvements to the Fund during the 2022 legislative session and we fully intend to do so. Pausing the program so that it can better serve disabled veterans, military spouses, non-residents, and near retirees will improve the program. A pause will also give the Long-Term Care Commission the ability to study and make recommendations about residents who move out of Washington to retire and assure that those who have opted out of the program maintain their private insurance policies. These improvements will provide security and stability now and into the future for this critical safety net for our state’s seniors and people with disabilities.
“Delaying implementation of the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment through the 2023 legislative session allows the Legislature time to pass the policy reforms that are ready to go now and to consider further recommendations from the Long-Term Care Commission.
“In addition to delaying the premium assessment, we also support employers pausing premium collections from employees in Washington so lawmakers can take necessary action. While we cannot direct employers not to collect, we strongly encourage them to pause on collecting premiums from employees, giving us time to pass legislation extending implementation dates until next year. We know that this extra time will allow us to find solutions and craft updates to the Fund that allows Washingtonians to age with dignity in their own homes.” – Sen. Andy Billig and Speaker Laurie Jinkins.
Successful Factory Tours Come to a Close
December 3, 2021
NWHPBA and HPBA manufacturers opened their doors this year to legislators from Idaho and Washington. These tours, originally done to showcase the work our manufacturers have done in creating clean-burning woodstoves to meet new EPA NSPS guidelines, also helped educate legislators about an important industry creating jobs in their district.
Kuma, IHP, Travis, and Blaze King all hosted their district legislators. Legislators received a tour of the factories, met employees, and learned about the nuances of manufacturing woodstoves (and gas appliances too). All of the manufacturers emphasized the differences between cordwood and crib testing methods and what the controversy around those testing methods meant for their industry.
All of the legislators involved are willing now to engage in woodstove policy discussions. They all appreciated learning what is involved and how wood and gas heating appliances not only provide beneficial heat for people in their districts but also how the hearth industry is providing needed jobs and benefits.
A summary video has been completed for each tour to help other NWHPBA and HPBA members see what is involved and how bringing legislators to your business can help bring our advocacy efforts to a new level. You can see these videos below.
We encourage all retailers and manufacturers to invite local legislators in to see what you do, visit with your employees, and understand the importance of the industry to your community. For assistance in setting up a legislative visit, please contact Carolyn Logue at [email protected].
Lawsuit Filed Against Washington’s Long-Term Care Program, WA Cares Fund
November 11, 2021
Article from The Seattle Times by Rachel La Corte
Written November 9, 2021 | Updated November 10, 2021
OLYMPIA – Opponents of a mandatory payroll tax to fund Washington state’s new long-term care program filed a lawsuit Tuesday in federal court seeking to stop the January start of the payroll premium for most employees in the state.
The suit filed with the federal court for the Western District of Washington, was filed on behalf of three businesses in the state and six individuals. None of the individuals purchased a private, long-term care insurance plan before Nov. 1, the deadline to qualify for an exemption.
Under the program, WA Cares Fund, workers will pay .58% of total pay per paycheck, meaning an employee with a salary of $50,000 will pay $290 a year. Starting
Jan. 1, 2025, people who need help with assistance with at least three “activities of daily living” such as bathing, dressing or administration of medication, can tap into the fund to pay for things like in-home care, home modifications like a wheelchair ramp and rides to the doctor.
The benefit will also cover home-delivered meals and reimbursement to unpaid family caregivers. The lifetime maximum of the benefit is $36,500, with annual increases to be determined based on inflation.
“The state simply does not have the power to mandate an employee benefit,” Richard Birmingham, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, said in a written statement announcing the lawsuit.
As of Nov. 4, the Employment Security Department had received more than 344,000 applications for an exemption, and just over 140,000 had been approved. Last week, agency spokesman Nick Demerice said that people seeking an exemption are being told that as long as they submit their exemption request by Dec. 1, ESD is guaranteeing that it will be processed it before the end of December.
Even though a private policy had to be purchased before Nov. 1 to opt out, people have until Dec. 31, 2022, to apply for an exemption — which means they may pay a year of the premium unless they opt out before the payroll deduction starts. No rebates are offered for any premiums already paid, and once a person receives an exemption, they are not able to opt back into the state program, even if they change jobs.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Jay Inslee said the office had not yet seen the lawsuit. Officials at the Employment Security Department and the Department of Social and Health Services, also named in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
According to AARP of Washington, 70% of residents 65 and older will require some type of assistance to live independently.
To be eligible for the state benefits, workers will have had to have paid the premium working at least 500 hours per year for three of the previous six years in which they’re seeking the benefit or for a total of 10 years, with at least five of those paid without interruption. The benefit is not portable, so people who pay into the program but later move out of state will not be able to access it, and it only covers the taxpayer, not a spouse or dependent. The benefit also isn’t available to those who work in Washington and will pay the deduction but live in neighboring states, like Oregon.
One of the named plaintiffs, Melissa Johnston, lives in Eagle Point, and works in Vancouver, Washington, and said in a written statement that she has no plan to retire in Washington.
“And yet the state is requiring that I buy a long-term care insurance product that can only be used if I retire in Washington—it just doesn’t make any sense,” she wrote.
Among the arguments made by the suit is that the WA Cares Fund violates a federal law that forbids the state from passing any law that requires employees to participate in a plan that provides sickness or medical benefits. It also says that the disparate treatment of people paying the tax but not receiving benefits if they are not a Washington resident violates the Equal Protection and the Privileges and Immunities clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
Additionally, the fact that people who are within 10 years of retirement will pay into the fund but not receive benefits is a violation of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, the suit contends.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – L&I Considers Contractor Registration Fee Increases
November 2, 2021
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) is considering raising the fee to register, renew or be reinstated as a contractor by 5.79%. The amount of the increase is the state Office of Financial Management’s maximum allowable fiscal growth factor rate for fiscal year 2022.
The increase is needed to ensure the Contractor Registration program remains consistent with fee increases required by statute and to help improve the program’s fund balance.
L&I is required to charge a fee for issuing or renewing a certificate of registration and to revise the fee at least once every two years in recognition of economic changes as reflected by the fiscal growth factor under chapter 43.135 RCW.
The current fee for a certificate of registration is $117.90. The certificate of registration lasts for two years.
The fee increase would affect WAC 296-200A-900, What fees does the department charge contractors for issuance, renewal, reregistration, and reinstatement of certificates of registration?
The agency filed a Preproposal Statement of Inquiry (CR-101) about the fee increase on October 19, 2021.
Opportunities to Comment:
There will be opportunities to provide written comments or present testimony at public hearings. You can find information about this rulemaking by going online to the agency’s “Rulemaking Activity” page.
If adopted, the new fees would take effect April 22, 2022.
Here’s What Happens Next:
- October 19, 2021: Pre-proposal (CR-101) filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- December 21, 2021: The Proposed rules (CR-102) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser
- January 26, 2022: A public hearing on the proposed rules is tentatively scheduled.
- March 22, 2022: The final rules (CR-103) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- April 22, 2022: The new rules are expected to take effect.
L&I may be considering additional fiscal growth factor fee increases for Contractor Registration for fiscal years 2023 and 2024. We will have more information as these possible rulemakings move forward.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Melissa McBride at [email protected], or call 360-902-5731. L&I Newsroom.
The Federal Government Makes It Official: It Will Cost More to Heat This Winter in Most Regions
October 13, 2021
Article by John Crouch, Director, Public Affairs, HPBA
Anyone who has purchased gasoline recently already suspects that energy may cost more this winter, but some families, in some parts of the country, may be in for a really big surprise. On October 13th the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) released their annual report known as the Winter Fuels Outlook. In this assessment, EIA calculates home heating costs for four regions of the U.S., and the five major fuels used, based on the most recent weather and energy price data.
One of the most striking items in this report is that virtually all households in the U.S. will see an increase in heating costs, based on the combination of higher energy prices, and forecasts of a colder winter that last year.
Families that heat with oil will see an average increase in expenditures of 43% over last year. While households that heat with natural gas will see an average national increase of 30% in expenditures, those in the Midwest will see an increase of 48%, followed by western families with an increase of 23 %. Even families in the south, that heat with propane, will see a 43% increase in winter heating costs. All the details can be found in the EIA report.
This report makes no assumptions about power outages, which are increasingly common in many areas, as we saw in Oregon and Texas last February. HPBA members know it has always paid to have a secondary source of heat, to provide security and create options to balance out price spikes. In Texas, Todd Harkrider, a fireplace retailer, noted: “most of our customers stayed nice and cozy inside their homes despite the electrical outage last winter, using their gas fireplaces for heat and cooking on their gas stoves. Some told me they were the most popular house in the neighborhood since they were the only place with heat.”
In Colorado, Lesley Short, owner of Lehrer’s Fireplace shops in Denver, adds, “If you’ve lived in Colorado very long, you know that blizzards can knock out our power, which is why lots of folks have either a gas fireplace, or an EPA-certified wood insert to keep warm, not to mention an outdoor grill for emergency cooking.”
The annual report from EIA is an early warning for what consumers are going to face this year. Our hope is this encourages consumers to think about a secondary source of heat – something our retailers know all about.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – For 2022, Washington Minimum Wage Rises to $14.49 Per Hour
Sept. 30, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) announced Wednesday the state’s minimum wage will rise to $14.49 per hour starting Jan. 1, 2022.
State law mandates L&I calculate the minimum wage for the coming year based on the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). L&I compares the CPI-W from August of the previous year to the index for August of the current year to make the calculation.
The result is the state’s current minimum wage of $13.69 will go up 5.83 percent next year. BLS attributed the increase in the price index to more expensive gas, housing, household furnishings, and food.
The state minimum wage applies to workers age 16 and older. Under state law, employers can pay 85 percent of the minimum wage to workers ages 14-15. For 2022, the wage for that younger group will be $12.32 per hour.
Cities are able to set minimum wages higher than the state’s, and both Seattle and Sea-Tac have higher wages.
For Overtime Exempt Employees:
The change in the minimum wage also means an increase in the minimum salary an employee must earn in 2022 to be overtime exempt. This impacts “white collar” positions held by executive, administrative, and professional workers plus computer professionals and outside salespeople.
Under the state’s rules governing exemptions to the Minimum Wage Act, salaried exempt employees must earn at least a minimum salary that is established as a multiplier of the minimum wage. Therefore, when the minimum wage increases, so does the salary threshold.
Those rules were updated in 2020. L&I created an eight-year implementation schedule that incrementally raises the multiplier until it reaches 2.5 times in 2028. The pace of the increase is based on the size of the employer.
For 2022, to be exempt from overtime, an employee must earn at least $1,014.30 a week ($52,743.60 a year), or 1.75 times the minimum wage.
Computer professionals who are paid by the hour have a different threshold. The new minimums are a part of changes to the overtime rules that took effect July 1, 2020.
The minimum wage applies to most jobs, including those in agriculture. In addition, agricultural workers will be eligible to earn overtime after working more than 55 hours per week, beginning Jan. 1, 2022.
L&I enforces the state’s wage-and-hour laws and investigates all wage-payment complaints.
More information about the minimum wage is available on L&I’s website, as are details about overtime, rest breaks, meal periods, and information on how to file a complaint. Employers and workers may also call 360-902-5316 or 1-866-219-7321.
For media information: Matthew Erlich, L&I Public Affairs, 360-902-6508.
L&I Newsroom. Connect with L&I: Facebook and Twitter.
Washington State Quick Legislative Update
September 23, 2021
A number of things are happening of interest:
CALL TO ACTION: STATE BUILDING CODE COUNCIL TO HOLD SPECIAL MEETING TO HEAR COMMENTS ON THE COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE
The State Building Code Council ran out of time last week and did not hear public comments on the commercial energy code proposal. They will be holding another virtual meeting Thursday, September 30, 2021 from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM to take comments.
Three specific proposals are concerning for those who want to maintain energy choice. Proposals 21-GP1-103 and 21-GP1-136 ban the use of fossil fuel heat pumps and water heaters in the commercial code. Proposal 21-GP1-179 requires electrical connections every place there is a fossil fuel appliance – significantly increasing the cost of putting in gas appliances. If these pass in the commercial code, it is more likely they will become part of the residential energy code updates next year.
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO CALL IN OR SEND AN EMAIL TO OPPOSE THESE SPECIFIC PROPOSALS THAT WILL EFFECTIVELY BAN NATURAL GAS IN COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
To send an email opposing Proposals 21-GP1-103, 21-GP1-236 and 21-GP1-179, send to Members of the Washington State Building Council.
Washington State Truck Parking Action Plan Metroquest Survey
September 20, 2021
The Washington State Legislature is seeking feedback from the trucking industry, especially truck drivers, on truck parking issues and strategies as part of a Truck Parking Action Plan for Washington State.
Your firsthand knowledge will help the Legislature better understand the current issues and create strategies to address near and long-term truck parking needs.
Please take a few minutes to complete the survey below and share it within your organization through September 30, 2021.
You can visit the Truck Parking Action Plan website for more information.
Washington State Emergency Heat Exposure Rules Increases Protection for Outdoor Workers
Employers Must Take Additional Precautions to Prevent Heat-Related Illness
July 9, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) filed an emergency rule today to provide increased protection for employees exposed to extreme heat, including those working in agriculture, construction and other outdoor industries. The emergency Outdoor Heat Exposure rule clarifies proactive steps that employers must take to prevent outdoor workers from suffering heat-related illness.
“The heat experienced in our state this year has reached catastrophic levels. The physical risk to individuals is significant, in particular those whose occupations have them outdoors all day,” said Gov. Jay Inslee. “Our state has rules in place to ensure these risks are mitigated, however, the real impacts of climate change have changed conditions since those rules were first written and we are responding.”
The new regulations, which take effect on July 13, are in addition to existing rules. When the temperature is at or above 100 degrees, employers must respond to the extreme heat by:
- Provide water that is cool enough to drink safely;
- Allow and encourage workers to take additional paid preventative cool-down rest to protect from overheating;
- Be prepared by having a written outdoor heat exposure safety program and providing training to employees; and,
- Respond appropriately to any employee with symptoms of heat-related illness.
The emergency rules update existing rules that are in place annually from May through the end of September. The existing rules already require ready access to at least one quart of drinking water per worker per hour, an outdoor heat exposure safety program with training, and an appropriate response to workers who are experiencing heat-related illness symptoms.
L&I will file an official notification for permanent rulemaking. Known as a CR-101, the notification is the first step in the process of updating the existing state Outdoor Heat Exposure Rule established in 2008.
“The recent heat wave is a reminder that extreme temperatures can be a real danger in the workplace. With more hot weather on the way, we’re taking action now,” said L&I Director Joel Sacks. “The emergency rule clarifies existing requirements and outlines commonsense steps employers must take to keep the workers who are responsible for growing our food, paving our roads, and putting up our buildings safe on the job.”
Craig Blackwood, acting assistant director for L&I’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, said the agency is already stepping up awareness and outreach efforts to amplify the existing rules and the tools in place to help employers and workers.
“In most cases, employers are doing the right thing and complying with the current heat stress rules,” said Blackwood. “The emergency rule clarifies the requirements and prompts employers to plan ahead for any further extreme heat waves that may happen this summer. As one of only three states in the nation with an outdoor heat stress rule, we have a good foundation to build on,” he said.
Working outdoors in hot weather is a health hazard that can result in serious medical conditions, including disability or death. Washington has on average 55 workers’ compensation claims per year for heat-related illnesses.
If you work outside, remember to start your workday fully hydrated, drink at least a quart of water every hour, know the early warning signs of heat stress and pay close attention to how you are feeling, and take regular breaks to cool yourself down. If you feel sick, stop working, move to a shaded place if possible, and tell someone so they can help monitor your symptoms or get help.
In the coming months, L&I will gather information from stakeholders to help create an initial draft of the updated Outdoor Heat Exposure rule. Like all permanent rulemaking processes, there will be opportunities for public input during the process.
Visit L&I’s Be Heat Smart web page for additional steps employers can take to protect employees working in hot temperatures.
For media information: Dina Lorraine, L&I Public Affairs, 360-972-4868
Connect with L&I: L&I Newsroom | Facebook | Twitter
What You Should Now About… Washington Coronavirus Response: Economic Resiliency Team – Joint Information Center, Camp Murray
June 3, 2021
View the Response Here or Click Image Below
WA Cares Fund Program Overview: A PowerPoint presentation on the new Long Term Care Act that has a Payroll Tax Going into Effect January 1, 2022.
View Presentation Here or Click Image Below
Masked and Distancing Requirements Are Changing: Key COVID-19 Updates for Fully Vaccinated Workers
May 21, 2021
View Updates Here or Click Flyer Below
Latest News
Washington State Building Code Council to Vote on Final Residential & Commercial Energy Code Proposals on November 4th
November 03, 2022
The Washington State Building Code Council is poised to do final votes on the adoption of the residential and commercial energy code proposals on November 4th. After the votes at this meeting, the adopted proposals will sit through a state legislative session before going into effect on July 1, 2023.
NWHPBA has been working on these proposals since they were initially proposed, arguing the need for gas to remain an option for supplemental heating. The threat to the availability of gas is through proposals that would incentivize the use of electric-only heat pumps and heat pump water heaters. The commercial code requires electric only, and the residential code allows gas appliances but then disincentivizes the use of these appliances through the credit options tables. These are the credits builders must acquire in the energy code in order to receive their permits to build.
NWHPBA members testified and sent in written comments. NWHPBA has submitted testimony as well and has been active with many other groups, including utilities, builders, and consumer groups who have been working to ensure gas can still be provided affordably to homes. There is nothing in the code that prohibits gas or propane fireplaces but the cost of running natural gas lines to new homes will create a situation where builders cannot afford to run these gas lines over time. If gas is already available, a fireplace can be installed.
According to the State Building Code Council, no more public comment will be taken on these codes. Our message is in, we just have to hope it has been heard. We do have several allies on the council who will be doing their best to fight the worst of the proposals. Several motions will be made to change proposals, including explicitly allowing high-efficiency gas heat pumps and heat pump water heaters to maintain the ability to run gas lines to homes.
After that, we go to the Legislature with bills to repeal or at least make sure natural gas is available to homes. This is where grassroots will be needed. In addition, two legal tracks are developing. We may find an opportunity to help with a union/contractor group that is developing a legal plan.
YOUR NATURAL GAS APPLIANCE BUSINESS IS AT RISK!
October 04, 2022
|
TAKE ACTION THIS WEEK TO STOP ATTEMPTS TO BAN NATURAL GAS
AND SAVE YOUR BUSINESS! The Washington State Building Code Council is holding a hearing on October 14th on the new Residential Energy and Building Code Proposals.
These proposals:
These extra costs will further hurt a homeowner’s ability to put supplemental and decorative hearth appliances into their new homes. HELP NWHPBA BY MAKING YOUR VOICE HEARD!
The hearing is going to be held Friday, October 14, 2022 from 10 AM – 5 PM.
The location of the hearing is: Location: Room 1213, 1500 Jefferson St SE; Olympia, WA 98504
What you can do!
You must submit a sign-up form to testify before the hearing date.
The sooner you sign up, the earlier you will be able to testify.
You must submit written testimony by 5 p.m. on Oct. 14, 2022.
KEY HEARTH INDUSTRY TALKING POINTS FOR TESTIMONY
AND WRITTEN COMMENTS
Insufficient, lacking or inaccurate cost data means this code is being put together without objective information regarding the impact on consumers, housing costs, and the businesses that build houses – including the hearth products industry. Supplemental heating in Washington State homes is essential. According to a 2019 study from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, four times as many people were killed from cold temperatures than from warm temperatures. While the focus of the energy code is on electrification and cooling via heat pumps, the council is ignoring the need to ensure resilient heating systems in our homes. Climate change may bring warmer temperatures in the summer, but the reality in the Northwest could still be significant fall and winter storms that knock out power to homes during cold months. Pressure on the electric grid, along with the demand from other states such as California for increased power, will put homes in Washington state in jeopardy of power outages – not when it is warm, but when it is colder. Residents in Washington utilize more electricity during cold weather events. Our building code should not disincentivize clean burning backup options such as natural gas fireplaces.
The proposed energy code currently disincentivizes natural gas through the credit options table and the need for builders to achieve a certain number of energy credits. This will result in fewer houses being built with ANY ability to have natural gas run to the home. This will not only reduce the number of gas fireplaces installed in homes originally, it will also reduce the choices for residents who want to add a supplemental heat option after their house is built – an action that is a reality after power outages occur.
|
IT’S TIME TO HELP LAWMAKERS GET TO KNOW YOUR BUSINESS!
June 14, 2022
In government affairs, we spend a lot of time telling business owners to get to know their lawmakers. But, we also need those lawmakers to get to know your business. The best way to do that is to invite them to your business. Let them see what you do. Let them meet your employees. This helps them better understand why you are concerned about issues when they come up in the state Legislature or in Congress. And it is the best way them to remember you and the hearth industry.
Take a couple minutes to watch this video and learn more about the benefits of bringing lawmakers into your business — and how easy it is too!
Proposal to Require All-Electric Home Construction Based on Outdated and Inaccurate Information
Article from Washington Policy Center
By Todd Myers
Originally Posted June 2, 2022 | Updated June 8, 2022
The Washington State Building Code Council (SBCC) is considering a ban on natural gas for residential construction. The proposal would “require new residential buildings to be built to be all-electric.” The members of the council are relying in part on an analysis done for the SBCC by the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) and the New Buildings Institute.
RMI was kind enough to share their updated cost analysis of the proposal. That transparency is really welcome and, in my experience, typical of the way RMI works – they are advocates for their position but are transparent about their analysis and arguments.
That analysis, however, has changed significantly from what was sent to SBCC members. The updated numbers from RMI themselves show requiring residential construction to be all-electric would increase homeowner costs.
Additionally, RMI’s assumptions for energy costs are outdated. Using updated cost estimates shows that over the next decade while electricity rates increase, natural gas costs will actually decline – the opposite of the outdated projections cited by the initial projections.
The primary justification for the proposed requirement is the claim that banning natural gas would “improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” The assumptions behind this claim are badly out of date and updated information indicates adoption of the code would do nothing to reduce CO2 emission.
In sum, these changes and inaccuracies show the policy would add costs to home ownership while doing nothing to reduce statewide CO2 emissions.
The combination of these changes and the dramatic change in the data indicate the SBCC should step back and reconsider the proposal.
Four elements of the analysis are worth noting.
New Estimates Show Construction Costs for Electrification Increases Costs
The Rocky Mountain Institute has updated the Life Cycle Costs (LCC) of the proposal and the previously claimed savings have turned into increased costs. In the packet provided to the SBCC, the proposal claims there is “no impact on housing affordability since this will actually save builders money.” The new data show the opposite.
For construction in Seattle, the new data show that construction costs are $6,763.84 for a home with a natural gas furnace and air conditioning, and $3,402.84 without air conditioning. For an all-electric home, the construction cost is $6,847, adding between $3,400 and $83 to construction costs. The analysis for Spokane is similar.
The remaining life-cycle savings are now entirely dependent on reduced utility costs. These estimates, however, are out of date and updated information turns these claimed savings into costs.
Updated Utility Cost Projections Turn Savings into Costs
The advocates of the regulation claim “World Bank long term forecasts indicate an increase of over 80% in gas prices over the coming decade.” The Life Cycle Calculation tool provided by OFM uses cost estimates from the Federal Life Cycle Costing Manual. It indicates that by 2029, natural gas prices will increase 13 percent and electricity costs will increase only two percent.
The most recent data from that manual, however, has very different projections. It estimates electricity costs will increase only one percent but natural gas costs will actually fall by 7 percent.
Additionally, in the long-term, the new numbers assume electricity costs will go up, while the old projection assumed electricity costs would decline. The new projection for natural gas, in the long run, is that costs would increase 14 percent in 2051, far lower than the old estimate of a 41 percent increase.
Using the new numbers dramatically reduces the potential savings. Using the old numbers, the electrification alternative saves $1,922 over the 50-year analysis timeline. Using the new numbers, the electrification alternative costs $303 more than using gas.
Using the RMI’s updated construction data and the new energy cost projections from the federal government shows the requirement to build all-electric would increase costs both for construction and utilities.
Flawed CO2 Emissions Estimates
Despite those increased costs, proponents may still argue that the regulations are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions, reducing the potential damage done by climate change. Here also the estimates used by RMI are inaccurate.
The reference case used in the report says residential CO2 emissions in 2020 amount to 11.4 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2. This estimate is used to calculate the potential reduction in CO2 emissions from the new rule.
According to the Washington State Department of Ecology, the actual amount included in their 2018 emissions report (the most recent available) is 4.8 MMT CO2. Of the state’s 98.5 MMT CO2 emissions, only 6 percent are from residential sources, and 4.9 percent of the state total is from residential natural gas.
The estimate included in the proposal is that electrification would reduce CO2 emissions by about 6 MMT in 2050. This seems unlikely since the current amount of natural gas-related emissions is a quarter less than the total projected savings.
By increasing the potential emissions reductions, the proposal exaggerates the potential reductions.
Proposed Restrictions Would Add Nothing to Total CO2 reductions
Even those exaggerated reductions are inaccurate. The report outlines the assumptions about total CO2 emissions in the reference case compared to banning natural gas and going to full electrification. These estimates come from the Washington State Energy Strategy Decarbonization report, released in December 2020.
Since that time, the state adopted a strict CO2 cap which requires state CO2 emissions to be cut in half by 2030 and reach 95% below 1990 levels by 2050. The levels assumed in the reference case are now illegal and the proposed building requirements don’t change those targets, they only dictate how they must be met.
Put more simply, this new rule does nothing to reduce CO2 emissions above what is already legally required. If these new requirements are not adopted, it will make no difference in Washington’s total emissions.
It can be claimed that requiring electrification of buildings would smooth that required transition, but the claimed CO2 reductions go away because the reference case is out of date. In RMI’s revised assessment, CO2 reduction accounts for between $7,000 and $11,500 of the claimed lifetime savings. Using current law, those savings are actually zero.
The proposal to require all-electric residential construction was based on two claims that are both out of date. First, that it would reduce the cost of construction and home ownership. The updated data from RMI and the federal government show that is inaccurate. Second, it is argued that these restrictions are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions. That is based on the 2020 policy environment. Since then, Washington has adopted a CO2 cap, making the baseline emissions assumptions inaccurate and illegal. In light of these significant changes, the members of the SBCC should table this proposal, if only to better understand the new data.
Update
The Technical Advisory Group to the State Building Code Council voted to adopt two proposals to require electric water and space heating (with some allowances). There were several last-minute changes to the proposal as well as the life-cycle analysis. As a result, the impacts of the policy voted on by the advisory group are unclear, although the new estimates indicated it would increase construction costs. Despite the lack of clarity and the new information contradicting the claims in the written proposal that it would not impact housing affordability, the rules were adopted. Now the proposals move on to the full State Building Code Council later this year.
CALL TO ACTION: Nominate Our Leaders!
May 13, 2022
Interested in participating in our decision-making? Nominate yourself today!
This is a great way to be involved to fight legislative issues and learn another side to your industry that is fun and exciting. Work with peers from four different states.
Minimal time commitment, as we meet only 4-6 times per year. Nominate yourself or a colleague by Friday, June 10th.
Board Positions Available
- 4 At-Large Positions
- 1 Idaho Position
- 1 Montana Position
- 1 Western Washington Position
2-year term (2022 – 2024). All paid 2022 members are eligible to vote.
Please email your nominations to: [email protected].
Great News! Governor to Appoint BIAW and AGC Nominees to State Building Code Council
April 7, 2022
Governor Will Also Pay $70,000 to Settle Records Suit
Under a legal settlement announced today, the two members of the Building Code Council the governor appointed to represent the residential and commercial building industries will resign. Then the governor must replace them with nominees from BIAW and AGC. The governor’s office must also pay BIAW $70,000 in connection with a separate Public Records Act lawsuit.
“This is a tremendous victory for the members of our association, for protecting the cost of housing and for holding elected officials accountable to following the law,” said BIAW Executive VP Greg Lane.
“The Building Code Council makes critical decisions that impact hundreds of thousands of homeowners and businesses. The law was rightfully designed to ensure industries like residential construction, that are directly affected by the code, have a seat at the table when changes are considered.”
Help Stop Unnecessary, Onerous, and Costly Ergonomics Rules on Business
February 22, 2022
HB 1837 would allow the Department of Labor and Industries to impose costly, complicated, and unnecessary regulations on all employers by overturning voter-approved Initiative 841.
Prior to the passage of Initiative 841, The Department of Labor & Industries adopted an 18-page confusing rule that required all employers to identify jobs that pose ergonomic hazards and then do whatever is “technologically and economically feasible” to eliminate those hazards. The “concise explanatory statement” for the rule was 126 pages long and the rules were anticipated to cost employers $725 million back in the early 2000s. That number would be over $1 billion in today’s dollars.
HB 1837, by repealing the initiative, paves the way for L&I to start regulating businesses on this issue again. We need to have all businesses sign in OPPOSED at the hearing on Wednesday and email their legislators to stop this bill from moving.
TODAY: Please sign in “CON”, opposing HB 1837 at Wednesday’s hearing in the Senate. (You must do this before 9:00 AM on Wednesday, February 25, 2022)
Then contact your State Senator to send them an email to OPPOSE HB 1837. Washington’s businesses cannot afford more rules!
Contact State Senator | State Senator Not Listed?
- Employers are already struggling with workforce and supply chain issues. Ergonomics regulations will make these situations worse.
- Ergonomics regulations will cost employers billions and lead to more automation.
- There is no consensus in the medical community on the causes and cures of repetitive motion injuries – individuals all have different risks.
- Ergonomics regulations will exacerbate our worker shortage, particularly in some of our most essential workplaces, by limiting how many hours employees can legally work.
- The Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that despite the passage of Initiative 841 (which prohibited L&I from adopting ergonomics rules), the Department can still require employers to address workplace musculoskeletal disorders (ergonomics) – thus employees are already protected.
- Businesses around the state are still trying to recover from the response to the pandemic. Ergonomics rules will be the nail in the coffin for many.
Thank You for Taking Action Today!
Breaking News Bulletin
February 18, 2022
Masks No Longer Required in Most Places Beginning March 21
COVID-19 Trends Give Leaders Confidence to Look Towards Next Phase of Pandemic Response
“Vaccination remains our most essential protection against severe illness and death from COVID-19. It’s also crucial to prevent our hospitals from being overwhelmed again,” Inslee said. “If you’ve been procrastinating, now is the time to join the more than 80% of eligible Washingtonians who have gotten at least one shot.”
Guidance for K-12 Schools Will Be Updated
“Our students, educators and school employees, and families have been incredibly resilient as we’ve navigated the impacts of the pandemic,” said Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal. “Our efforts over the past two years have led us to this moment. Nearly all of our school employees are vaccinated, the number of vaccinated students increases each day, and we have one of the most robust COVID-19 school testing programs in the country. Moving away from a statewide mask mandate to masks being encouraged is a safe next step as we move from pandemic to endemic.”
Employers Must Continue Adhering to Safe Workplace Protocols
COVID-19 remains a recognized workplace hazard. When masks are no longer required in the workplace, employers must continue taking steps to assess COVID-19 transmission risks to employees and taking steps to minimize those risks. Risks vary depending on the workspace and conditions. Possible steps could include promoting vaccination, improving ventilation, offering face masks, encouraging social distancing or installing sneeze guards or barriers.
Employers are still required to notify workers of potential exposures when a co-worker has a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19, and, in worksites with 50 or more employees, report outbreaks of 10 or more confirmed cases to the state Department of Labor & Industries.
Employers must also allow workers to continue to wear masks if they choose. In 2021, the Legislature passed SSB 5254, which protects a worker’s right to wear a face covering and other protective devices during a public health emergency. The governor is amending an existing worker safety and protection emergency order, Proclamation 21-08, to reflect this new state law. Proclamation 21-08 already prohibits employers from taking adverse action against a worker for taking COVID-related health actions, including getting vaccinated and taking time off to get vaccinated or seek treatment, and it will now also protect workers from any adverse action for wearing a face covering while we remain in a state of emergency.
“Caution, Compassion and Kindness is What Will Allow Us to Move Forward, Together”
While the transition to the next phase of the pandemic is reason for hope, Inslee emphasized that many families and individuals will continue taking precautions such as wearing face masks at school and work.
URGENT – SIGN IN TO OPPOSE ESHB 1770!
February 16, 2022
REGARDING ENERGY CODES TODAY!
It’s time to do it again! We need to show OPPOSITION for SHB 1770, the bill that would increase the requirements of our state energy code. This bill not only requires all homes to be net zero ready by 2034, it also focuses on greenhouse gas emission reductions rather than energy efficiency which changes the dynamics of the state energy code.
The biggest thing this bill does is create a statewide residential “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments can adopt. This would create confusion by having local governments with codes that are different than the state energy code.
SHB 1770 will increase the costs of housing by thousands of dollars and wreak havoc with the labor and supply chains when it comes to heating and cooling options for housing. In addition, since it moves the energy code further away from natural gas, options for secondary heating and energy efficient appliances will be eliminated for homeowners.
YOUR ACTIONS ARE WORKING! So far, your actions have led to the defeat of two of the four “building decarbonization” bills that are threatening this industry. We can’t let our guard down now.
You must sign in BEFORE 9 AM tomorrow to be counted on the record.
THANK YOU AND KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
Sign In Opposing ESHB 1770 | View Full Bill
URGENT – CALL YOUR LEGISLATORS TODAY!
February 11, 2022
TELL THEM TO OPPOSE SHB 1770 – WHICH WILL MAKE WASHINGTON STATE’S ENERGY CODE EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE AND DIFFICULT.
The Washington State House of Representatives is poised to take a vote on SHB 1770 – strengthening energy codes. This bill makes significant changes to the existing state energy code. It changes the goal from one of “energy efficiency” to greenhouse gas emission reductions. This will force all new residential buildings to full electrification – regardless of whether or not non-electric appliances would be more affordable and energy-efficient. It also creates a “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments could adopt – which would be more stringent and restrictive than the state energy code.
Why OPPOSE SHB 1770:
- It would be devastating to housing affordability in Washington State – increasing the cost of building a home by thousands of dollars – particularly if homes are required to be “net zero ready” or “solar ready” as is demanded by this bill.
- It would encourage the banning of natural gas connections – particularly through the local reach code – putting millions of Washingtonians at risk when power outages occur because they would not have a secondary heating or cooking resource and reducing the ability to choose the most efficient, affordable energy source for their home.
- It exacerbates the labor shortage. Requiring builders to make all houses “net zero ready” and to be “solar ready” will require more electricians than are available now. In addition, current laws actually keep specialty electricians from doing some of the needed work which means fewer available workers, more delays and more cost.
- It exacerbates the supply chain issue – Washington state builders and contractors are already limited in what they can use in residential construction because of our existing strict energy code (which just went into effect during the pandemic). This would put even more product out of reach for Washington builders – -increasing costs and delays and disrupting attempts to build affordable housing.
LEGISLATORS NEED TO SET THIS BILL DOWN. OUR CURRENT STATE ENERGY CODE ALREADY IS WORKING TOWARD VERY STRINGENT GOALS THAT WILL HELP CLIMATE CHANGE. LET THE CURRENT PROCESS WORK AND DO NOT ADD NEW GOALS OR REQUIREMENTS THAT INCREASE THE COST OF HOUSING, LEAD TO BANS ON NATURAL GAS, AND EXACERBATE THE SUPPLY CHAIN! WASHINGTON CITIZENS CAN NOT AFFORD THIS BILL!
CONTACT YOUR TWO STATE REPRESENTATIVES TODAY! TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON SHB 1770 TO PRESERVE JOBS AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING!
To Contact your Two-State Reps – follow this link to FIND YOUR DISTRICT and identify your two representatives. Then go to this link to FIND THEIR EMAIL AND PHONE NUMBER so you can contact them directly.
URGENT – YOUR ACTION NEEDED NOW!! KEY HEARING ON FRIDAY
January 11, 2022
ACTION REQUESTED: THE HEARTH INDUSTRY IN WASHINGTON STATE NEEDS TO GET INVOLVED NOW!
TAKE ACTION: Use this form* to indicate that you are OPPOSED to the bill. Select CON from the first dropdown.
SUBMIT YOUR POSITION. CLICK HERE >>> SIGN IN OPPOSED, NO TESTIMONY
*Be sure to select CON from the first dropdown to indicate your position.
We need to get as many people as possible in the industry to SIGN IN OPPOSED to the bill.
It’s week one of the Washington State Legislature and we already have almost 1,000 bills introduced for the 60-day session. One of the bills is a major threat to the hearth industry (to both wood and gas) and will be discussed at a hearing THIS FRIDAY.
HB 1767 is the “Targeted Electrification Bill” which requires utilities (including gas utilities) to make plans to move people away from fossil fuel-burning appliances. It has a hearing in the House Environment and Energy Committee from 10 AM-12 PM this Friday, January 14th!
“Targeted Electrification” is defined as: the conversion to electricity from fossil fuel or wood of an energy end-use or energy source in a way that provides a net benefit to the utility as determined consistent with subsection (3) of this section.
This definition would have utilities not only working to move customers away from gas appliances but also wood appliances.
THIS IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THE HEARTH INDUSTRY! Not only will it be used to eliminate gas appliances as a primary or secondary heating source, but it also potentially could bring the elimination of woodstoves as a primary or secondary heating source.
WAGE & HOUR BULLETIN: L&I Webinars Can Help You Understand Washington’s Wage & Hour Laws
January 4, 2022
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries’ (L&I) Employment Standards Program is hosting 20 webinars early in 2022 to help employers and workers understand Washington’s wage and hour laws.
The webinar topics include protections for isolated workers, overtime exemptions for white-collar workers, and requirements under the Equal Pay and Opportunities Act. There are also webinars available in English and Spanish that explain the new agricultural overtime law that took effect on January 1, 2022. The program also offers webinars that provide an overview of minimum wage, overtime, paid sick leave, and other workplace rights regulations.
To find the times and to register for any of these webinars, go to L&I’s Workshops & Training web page and search for the webinar by its title in the “Event Title” drop-down menu.
First Quarter of 2022 Webinar Schedule:
January:
5 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
11 – Isolated Worker Protections
12 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
19 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
20 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
25 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
26 – Know Your Worker Rights
February:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
In8 – Isolated Worker Protections
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
22 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
March:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
29 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
Interpretation Services
L&I can provide interpretation services for these sessions at no cost to you when you request them ahead of time. Send an email to [email protected] to request these services.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact Employment Standards Program at their website, by phone, or by email.
Important Update Regarding Washington’s Long-Term Care Program & Collection of Employee Premiums
December 30, 2021
Over the last two weeks, we have reached out to the Governor’s Office and Employment Security Department to advocate for the important change to the rule. Unfortunately, neither the governor nor the agency has immediate plans to revise the rule. As a result, the existing rule, with its employer liability, remains the law.
- (2) When an employer is found by the department to be noncompliant with collecting premiums from an employee, the employer must file an amended report and pay the past due premiums.
Without a change in the rule, the employers’ liability still exists, despite public statements by policy makers.
WA Cares Fund Premium Delayed
December 17, 2021
In case you missed it: Gov. Jay Inslee, together with Senate Majority Leader Andy Billig and House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, released the following statements this morning on delaying the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment:
“I have been in ongoing discussions with legislators about the long-term care bill, which is set to begin collecting funds in January. This bill will help provide much-needed care and coverage for Washingtonians as they age. However, legislators have identified some areas that need adjustments and I agree. We need to give legislators the opportunity to make refinements to the bill. Therefore, I am taking measures within my authority and ordering the state Employment Security Department not to collect the premiums from this program from employers before they come due in April. My actions mean that the state will not collect those funds until the Legislature sorts through these issues. While legislation is under consideration to pause the withholding of LTC fees, employers will not be subject to penalties and interest for not withholding fees from employees’ wages during this transition.” – Gov. Jay Inslee
“The Legislature passed the Long-Term Services and Supports Act, now known as the Washington Cares Fund, in 2019 to ensure the people of Washington have a convenient, cost-effective long-term care option they can rely on without bankrupting them or denying them coverage for pre-existing conditions. The legislature has the opportunity to delay the Cares Fund premium assessment this year in order to make improvements to the Fund during the 2022 legislative session and we fully intend to do so. Pausing the program so that it can better serve disabled veterans, military spouses, non-residents, and near retirees will improve the program. A pause will also give the Long-Term Care Commission the ability to study and make recommendations about residents who move out of Washington to retire and assure that those who have opted out of the program maintain their private insurance policies. These improvements will provide security and stability now and into the future for this critical safety net for our state’s seniors and people with disabilities.
“Delaying implementation of the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment through the 2023 legislative session allows the Legislature time to pass the policy reforms that are ready to go now and to consider further recommendations from the Long-Term Care Commission.
“In addition to delaying the premium assessment, we also support employers pausing premium collections from employees in Washington so lawmakers can take necessary action. While we cannot direct employers not to collect, we strongly encourage them to pause on collecting premiums from employees, giving us time to pass legislation extending implementation dates until next year. We know that this extra time will allow us to find solutions and craft updates to the Fund that allows Washingtonians to age with dignity in their own homes.” – Sen. Andy Billig and Speaker Laurie Jinkins.
Successful Factory Tours Come to a Close
December 3, 2021
NWHPBA and HPBA manufacturers opened their doors this year to legislators from Idaho and Washington. These tours, originally done to showcase the work our manufacturers have done in creating clean-burning woodstoves to meet new EPA NSPS guidelines, also helped educate legislators about an important industry creating jobs in their district.
Kuma, IHP, Travis, and Blaze King all hosted their district legislators. Legislators received a tour of the factories, met employees, and learned about the nuances of manufacturing woodstoves (and gas appliances too). All of the manufacturers emphasized the differences between cordwood and crib testing methods and what the controversy around those testing methods meant for their industry.
All of the legislators involved are willing now to engage in woodstove policy discussions. They all appreciated learning what is involved and how wood and gas heating appliances not only provide beneficial heat for people in their districts but also how the hearth industry is providing needed jobs and benefits.
A summary video has been completed for each tour to help other NWHPBA and HPBA members see what is involved and how bringing legislators to your business can help bring our advocacy efforts to a new level. You can see these videos below.
We encourage all retailers and manufacturers to invite local legislators in to see what you do, visit with your employees, and understand the importance of the industry to your community. For assistance in setting up a legislative visit, please contact Carolyn Logue at [email protected].
Lawsuit Filed Against Washington’s Long-Term Care Program, WA Cares Fund
November 11, 2021
Article from The Seattle Times by Rachel La Corte
Written November 9, 2021 | Updated November 10, 2021
OLYMPIA – Opponents of a mandatory payroll tax to fund Washington state’s new long-term care program filed a lawsuit Tuesday in federal court seeking to stop the January start of the payroll premium for most employees in the state.
The suit filed with the federal court for the Western District of Washington, was filed on behalf of three businesses in the state and six individuals. None of the individuals purchased a private, long-term care insurance plan before Nov. 1, the deadline to qualify for an exemption.
Under the program, WA Cares Fund, workers will pay .58% of total pay per paycheck, meaning an employee with a salary of $50,000 will pay $290 a year. Starting
Jan. 1, 2025, people who need help with assistance with at least three “activities of daily living” such as bathing, dressing or administration of medication, can tap into the fund to pay for things like in-home care, home modifications like a wheelchair ramp and rides to the doctor.
The benefit will also cover home-delivered meals and reimbursement to unpaid family caregivers. The lifetime maximum of the benefit is $36,500, with annual increases to be determined based on inflation.
“The state simply does not have the power to mandate an employee benefit,” Richard Birmingham, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, said in a written statement announcing the lawsuit.
As of Nov. 4, the Employment Security Department had received more than 344,000 applications for an exemption, and just over 140,000 had been approved. Last week, agency spokesman Nick Demerice said that people seeking an exemption are being told that as long as they submit their exemption request by Dec. 1, ESD is guaranteeing that it will be processed it before the end of December.
Even though a private policy had to be purchased before Nov. 1 to opt out, people have until Dec. 31, 2022, to apply for an exemption — which means they may pay a year of the premium unless they opt out before the payroll deduction starts. No rebates are offered for any premiums already paid, and once a person receives an exemption, they are not able to opt back into the state program, even if they change jobs.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Jay Inslee said the office had not yet seen the lawsuit. Officials at the Employment Security Department and the Department of Social and Health Services, also named in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
According to AARP of Washington, 70% of residents 65 and older will require some type of assistance to live independently.
To be eligible for the state benefits, workers will have had to have paid the premium working at least 500 hours per year for three of the previous six years in which they’re seeking the benefit or for a total of 10 years, with at least five of those paid without interruption. The benefit is not portable, so people who pay into the program but later move out of state will not be able to access it, and it only covers the taxpayer, not a spouse or dependent. The benefit also isn’t available to those who work in Washington and will pay the deduction but live in neighboring states, like Oregon.
One of the named plaintiffs, Melissa Johnston, lives in Eagle Point, and works in Vancouver, Washington, and said in a written statement that she has no plan to retire in Washington.
“And yet the state is requiring that I buy a long-term care insurance product that can only be used if I retire in Washington—it just doesn’t make any sense,” she wrote.
Among the arguments made by the suit is that the WA Cares Fund violates a federal law that forbids the state from passing any law that requires employees to participate in a plan that provides sickness or medical benefits. It also says that the disparate treatment of people paying the tax but not receiving benefits if they are not a Washington resident violates the Equal Protection and the Privileges and Immunities clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
Additionally, the fact that people who are within 10 years of retirement will pay into the fund but not receive benefits is a violation of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, the suit contends.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – L&I Considers Contractor Registration Fee Increases
November 2, 2021
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) is considering raising the fee to register, renew or be reinstated as a contractor by 5.79%. The amount of the increase is the state Office of Financial Management’s maximum allowable fiscal growth factor rate for fiscal year 2022.
The increase is needed to ensure the Contractor Registration program remains consistent with fee increases required by statute and to help improve the program’s fund balance.
L&I is required to charge a fee for issuing or renewing a certificate of registration and to revise the fee at least once every two years in recognition of economic changes as reflected by the fiscal growth factor under chapter 43.135 RCW.
The current fee for a certificate of registration is $117.90. The certificate of registration lasts for two years.
The fee increase would affect WAC 296-200A-900, What fees does the department charge contractors for issuance, renewal, reregistration, and reinstatement of certificates of registration?
The agency filed a Preproposal Statement of Inquiry (CR-101) about the fee increase on October 19, 2021.
Opportunities to Comment:
There will be opportunities to provide written comments or present testimony at public hearings. You can find information about this rulemaking by going online to the agency’s “Rulemaking Activity” page.
If adopted, the new fees would take effect April 22, 2022.
Here’s What Happens Next:
- October 19, 2021: Pre-proposal (CR-101) filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- December 21, 2021: The Proposed rules (CR-102) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser
- January 26, 2022: A public hearing on the proposed rules is tentatively scheduled.
- March 22, 2022: The final rules (CR-103) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- April 22, 2022: The new rules are expected to take effect.
L&I may be considering additional fiscal growth factor fee increases for Contractor Registration for fiscal years 2023 and 2024. We will have more information as these possible rulemakings move forward.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Melissa McBride at [email protected], or call 360-902-5731. L&I Newsroom.
The Federal Government Makes It Official: It Will Cost More to Heat This Winter in Most Regions
October 13, 2021
Article by John Crouch, Director, Public Affairs, HPBA
Anyone who has purchased gasoline recently already suspects that energy may cost more this winter, but some families, in some parts of the country, may be in for a really big surprise. On October 13th the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) released their annual report known as the Winter Fuels Outlook. In this assessment, EIA calculates home heating costs for four regions of the U.S., and the five major fuels used, based on the most recent weather and energy price data.
One of the most striking items in this report is that virtually all households in the U.S. will see an increase in heating costs, based on the combination of higher energy prices, and forecasts of a colder winter that last year.
Families that heat with oil will see an average increase in expenditures of 43% over last year. While households that heat with natural gas will see an average national increase of 30% in expenditures, those in the Midwest will see an increase of 48%, followed by western families with an increase of 23 %. Even families in the south, that heat with propane, will see a 43% increase in winter heating costs. All the details can be found in the EIA report.
This report makes no assumptions about power outages, which are increasingly common in many areas, as we saw in Oregon and Texas last February. HPBA members know it has always paid to have a secondary source of heat, to provide security and create options to balance out price spikes. In Texas, Todd Harkrider, a fireplace retailer, noted: “most of our customers stayed nice and cozy inside their homes despite the electrical outage last winter, using their gas fireplaces for heat and cooking on their gas stoves. Some told me they were the most popular house in the neighborhood since they were the only place with heat.”
In Colorado, Lesley Short, owner of Lehrer’s Fireplace shops in Denver, adds, “If you’ve lived in Colorado very long, you know that blizzards can knock out our power, which is why lots of folks have either a gas fireplace, or an EPA-certified wood insert to keep warm, not to mention an outdoor grill for emergency cooking.”
The annual report from EIA is an early warning for what consumers are going to face this year. Our hope is this encourages consumers to think about a secondary source of heat – something our retailers know all about.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – For 2022, Washington Minimum Wage Rises to $14.49 Per Hour
Sept. 30, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) announced Wednesday the state’s minimum wage will rise to $14.49 per hour starting Jan. 1, 2022.
State law mandates L&I calculate the minimum wage for the coming year based on the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). L&I compares the CPI-W from August of the previous year to the index for August of the current year to make the calculation.
The result is the state’s current minimum wage of $13.69 will go up 5.83 percent next year. BLS attributed the increase in the price index to more expensive gas, housing, household furnishings, and food.
The state minimum wage applies to workers age 16 and older. Under state law, employers can pay 85 percent of the minimum wage to workers ages 14-15. For 2022, the wage for that younger group will be $12.32 per hour.
Cities are able to set minimum wages higher than the state’s, and both Seattle and Sea-Tac have higher wages.
For Overtime Exempt Employees:
The change in the minimum wage also means an increase in the minimum salary an employee must earn in 2022 to be overtime exempt. This impacts “white collar” positions held by executive, administrative, and professional workers plus computer professionals and outside salespeople.
Under the state’s rules governing exemptions to the Minimum Wage Act, salaried exempt employees must earn at least a minimum salary that is established as a multiplier of the minimum wage. Therefore, when the minimum wage increases, so does the salary threshold.
Those rules were updated in 2020. L&I created an eight-year implementation schedule that incrementally raises the multiplier until it reaches 2.5 times in 2028. The pace of the increase is based on the size of the employer.
For 2022, to be exempt from overtime, an employee must earn at least $1,014.30 a week ($52,743.60 a year), or 1.75 times the minimum wage.
Computer professionals who are paid by the hour have a different threshold. The new minimums are a part of changes to the overtime rules that took effect July 1, 2020.
The minimum wage applies to most jobs, including those in agriculture. In addition, agricultural workers will be eligible to earn overtime after working more than 55 hours per week, beginning Jan. 1, 2022.
L&I enforces the state’s wage-and-hour laws and investigates all wage-payment complaints.
More information about the minimum wage is available on L&I’s website, as are details about overtime, rest breaks, meal periods, and information on how to file a complaint. Employers and workers may also call 360-902-5316 or 1-866-219-7321.
For media information: Matthew Erlich, L&I Public Affairs, 360-902-6508.
L&I Newsroom. Connect with L&I: Facebook and Twitter.
Washington State Quick Legislative Update
September 23, 2021
A number of things are happening of interest:
CALL TO ACTION: STATE BUILDING CODE COUNCIL TO HOLD SPECIAL MEETING TO HEAR COMMENTS ON THE COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE
The State Building Code Council ran out of time last week and did not hear public comments on the commercial energy code proposal. They will be holding another virtual meeting Thursday, September 30, 2021 from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM to take comments.
Three specific proposals are concerning for those who want to maintain energy choice. Proposals 21-GP1-103 and 21-GP1-136 ban the use of fossil fuel heat pumps and water heaters in the commercial code. Proposal 21-GP1-179 requires electrical connections every place there is a fossil fuel appliance – significantly increasing the cost of putting in gas appliances. If these pass in the commercial code, it is more likely they will become part of the residential energy code updates next year.
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO CALL IN OR SEND AN EMAIL TO OPPOSE THESE SPECIFIC PROPOSALS THAT WILL EFFECTIVELY BAN NATURAL GAS IN COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
To send an email opposing Proposals 21-GP1-103, 21-GP1-236 and 21-GP1-179, send to Members of the Washington State Building Council.
Washington State Truck Parking Action Plan Metroquest Survey
September 20, 2021
The Washington State Legislature is seeking feedback from the trucking industry, especially truck drivers, on truck parking issues and strategies as part of a Truck Parking Action Plan for Washington State.
Your firsthand knowledge will help the Legislature better understand the current issues and create strategies to address near and long-term truck parking needs.
Please take a few minutes to complete the survey below and share it within your organization through September 30, 2021.
You can visit the Truck Parking Action Plan website for more information.
Washington State Emergency Heat Exposure Rules Increases Protection for Outdoor Workers
Employers Must Take Additional Precautions to Prevent Heat-Related Illness
July 9, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) filed an emergency rule today to provide increased protection for employees exposed to extreme heat, including those working in agriculture, construction and other outdoor industries. The emergency Outdoor Heat Exposure rule clarifies proactive steps that employers must take to prevent outdoor workers from suffering heat-related illness.
“The heat experienced in our state this year has reached catastrophic levels. The physical risk to individuals is significant, in particular those whose occupations have them outdoors all day,” said Gov. Jay Inslee. “Our state has rules in place to ensure these risks are mitigated, however, the real impacts of climate change have changed conditions since those rules were first written and we are responding.”
The new regulations, which take effect on July 13, are in addition to existing rules. When the temperature is at or above 100 degrees, employers must respond to the extreme heat by:
- Provide water that is cool enough to drink safely;
- Allow and encourage workers to take additional paid preventative cool-down rest to protect from overheating;
- Be prepared by having a written outdoor heat exposure safety program and providing training to employees; and,
- Respond appropriately to any employee with symptoms of heat-related illness.
The emergency rules update existing rules that are in place annually from May through the end of September. The existing rules already require ready access to at least one quart of drinking water per worker per hour, an outdoor heat exposure safety program with training, and an appropriate response to workers who are experiencing heat-related illness symptoms.
L&I will file an official notification for permanent rulemaking. Known as a CR-101, the notification is the first step in the process of updating the existing state Outdoor Heat Exposure Rule established in 2008.
“The recent heat wave is a reminder that extreme temperatures can be a real danger in the workplace. With more hot weather on the way, we’re taking action now,” said L&I Director Joel Sacks. “The emergency rule clarifies existing requirements and outlines commonsense steps employers must take to keep the workers who are responsible for growing our food, paving our roads, and putting up our buildings safe on the job.”
Craig Blackwood, acting assistant director for L&I’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, said the agency is already stepping up awareness and outreach efforts to amplify the existing rules and the tools in place to help employers and workers.
“In most cases, employers are doing the right thing and complying with the current heat stress rules,” said Blackwood. “The emergency rule clarifies the requirements and prompts employers to plan ahead for any further extreme heat waves that may happen this summer. As one of only three states in the nation with an outdoor heat stress rule, we have a good foundation to build on,” he said.
Working outdoors in hot weather is a health hazard that can result in serious medical conditions, including disability or death. Washington has on average 55 workers’ compensation claims per year for heat-related illnesses.
If you work outside, remember to start your workday fully hydrated, drink at least a quart of water every hour, know the early warning signs of heat stress and pay close attention to how you are feeling, and take regular breaks to cool yourself down. If you feel sick, stop working, move to a shaded place if possible, and tell someone so they can help monitor your symptoms or get help.
In the coming months, L&I will gather information from stakeholders to help create an initial draft of the updated Outdoor Heat Exposure rule. Like all permanent rulemaking processes, there will be opportunities for public input during the process.
Visit L&I’s Be Heat Smart web page for additional steps employers can take to protect employees working in hot temperatures.
For media information: Dina Lorraine, L&I Public Affairs, 360-972-4868
Connect with L&I: L&I Newsroom | Facebook | Twitter
What You Should Now About… Washington Coronavirus Response: Economic Resiliency Team – Joint Information Center, Camp Murray
June 3, 2021
View the Response Here or Click Image Below
WA Cares Fund Program Overview: A PowerPoint presentation on the new Long Term Care Act that has a Payroll Tax Going into Effect January 1, 2022.
View Presentation Here or Click Image Below
Masked and Distancing Requirements Are Changing: Key COVID-19 Updates for Fully Vaccinated Workers
May 21, 2021
View Updates Here or Click Flyer Below
Latest News
IT’S TIME TO HELP LAWMAKERS GET TO KNOW YOUR BUSINESS!
June 14, 2022
In government affairs, we spend a lot of time telling business owners to get to know their lawmakers. But, we also need those lawmakers to get to know your business. The best way to do that is to invite them to your business. Let them see what you do. Let them meet your employees. This helps them better understand why you are concerned about issues when they come up in the state Legislature or in Congress. And it is the best way them to remember you and the hearth industry.
Take a couple minutes to watch this video and learn more about the benefits of bringing lawmakers into your business — and how easy it is too!
Proposal to Require All-Electric Home Construction Based on Outdated and Inaccurate Information
Article from Washington Policy Center
By Todd Myers
Originally Posted June 2, 2022 | Updated June 8, 2022
The Washington State Building Code Council (SBCC) is considering a ban on natural gas for residential construction. The proposal would “require new residential buildings to be built to be all-electric.” The members of the council are relying in part on an analysis done for the SBCC by the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) and the New Buildings Institute.
RMI was kind enough to share their updated cost analysis of the proposal. That transparency is really welcome and, in my experience, typical of the way RMI works – they are advocates for their position but are transparent about their analysis and arguments.
That analysis, however, has changed significantly from what was sent to SBCC members. The updated numbers from RMI themselves show requiring residential construction to be all-electric would increase homeowner costs.
Additionally, RMI’s assumptions for energy costs are outdated. Using updated cost estimates shows that over the next decade while electricity rates increase, natural gas costs will actually decline – the opposite of the outdated projections cited by the initial projections.
The primary justification for the proposed requirement is the claim that banning natural gas would “improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” The assumptions behind this claim are badly out of date and updated information indicates adoption of the code would do nothing to reduce CO2 emission.
In sum, these changes and inaccuracies show the policy would add costs to home ownership while doing nothing to reduce statewide CO2 emissions.
The combination of these changes and the dramatic change in the data indicate the SBCC should step back and reconsider the proposal.
Four elements of the analysis are worth noting.
New Estimates Show Construction Costs for Electrification Increases Costs
The Rocky Mountain Institute has updated the Life Cycle Costs (LCC) of the proposal and the previously claimed savings have turned into increased costs. In the packet provided to the SBCC, the proposal claims there is “no impact on housing affordability since this will actually save builders money.” The new data show the opposite.
For construction in Seattle, the new data show that construction costs are $6,763.84 for a home with a natural gas furnace and air conditioning, and $3,402.84 without air conditioning. For an all-electric home, the construction cost is $6,847, adding between $3,400 and $83 to construction costs. The analysis for Spokane is similar.
The remaining life-cycle savings are now entirely dependent on reduced utility costs. These estimates, however, are out of date and updated information turns these claimed savings into costs.
Updated Utility Cost Projections Turn Savings into Costs
The advocates of the regulation claim “World Bank long term forecasts indicate an increase of over 80% in gas prices over the coming decade.” The Life Cycle Calculation tool provided by OFM uses cost estimates from the Federal Life Cycle Costing Manual. It indicates that by 2029, natural gas prices will increase 13 percent and electricity costs will increase only two percent.
The most recent data from that manual, however, has very different projections. It estimates electricity costs will increase only one percent but natural gas costs will actually fall by 7 percent.
Additionally, in the long-term, the new numbers assume electricity costs will go up, while the old projection assumed electricity costs would decline. The new projection for natural gas, in the long run, is that costs would increase 14 percent in 2051, far lower than the old estimate of a 41 percent increase.
Using the new numbers dramatically reduces the potential savings. Using the old numbers, the electrification alternative saves $1,922 over the 50-year analysis timeline. Using the new numbers, the electrification alternative costs $303 more than using gas.
Using the RMI’s updated construction data and the new energy cost projections from the federal government shows the requirement to build all-electric would increase costs both for construction and utilities.
Flawed CO2 Emissions Estimates
Despite those increased costs, proponents may still argue that the regulations are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions, reducing the potential damage done by climate change. Here also the estimates used by RMI are inaccurate.
The reference case used in the report says residential CO2 emissions in 2020 amount to 11.4 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2. This estimate is used to calculate the potential reduction in CO2 emissions from the new rule.
According to the Washington State Department of Ecology, the actual amount included in their 2018 emissions report (the most recent available) is 4.8 MMT CO2. Of the state’s 98.5 MMT CO2 emissions, only 6 percent are from residential sources, and 4.9 percent of the state total is from residential natural gas.
The estimate included in the proposal is that electrification would reduce CO2 emissions by about 6 MMT in 2050. This seems unlikely since the current amount of natural gas-related emissions is a quarter less than the total projected savings.
By increasing the potential emissions reductions, the proposal exaggerates the potential reductions.
Proposed Restrictions Would Add Nothing to Total CO2 reductions
Even those exaggerated reductions are inaccurate. The report outlines the assumptions about total CO2 emissions in the reference case compared to banning natural gas and going to full electrification. These estimates come from the Washington State Energy Strategy Decarbonization report, released in December 2020.
Since that time, the state adopted a strict CO2 cap which requires state CO2 emissions to be cut in half by 2030 and reach 95% below 1990 levels by 2050. The levels assumed in the reference case are now illegal and the proposed building requirements don’t change those targets, they only dictate how they must be met.
Put more simply, this new rule does nothing to reduce CO2 emissions above what is already legally required. If these new requirements are not adopted, it will make no difference in Washington’s total emissions.
It can be claimed that requiring electrification of buildings would smooth that required transition, but the claimed CO2 reductions go away because the reference case is out of date. In RMI’s revised assessment, CO2 reduction accounts for between $7,000 and $11,500 of the claimed lifetime savings. Using current law, those savings are actually zero.
The proposal to require all-electric residential construction was based on two claims that are both out of date. First, that it would reduce the cost of construction and home ownership. The updated data from RMI and the federal government show that is inaccurate. Second, it is argued that these restrictions are necessary to reduce statewide CO2 emissions. That is based on the 2020 policy environment. Since then, Washington has adopted a CO2 cap, making the baseline emissions assumptions inaccurate and illegal. In light of these significant changes, the members of the SBCC should table this proposal, if only to better understand the new data.
Update
The Technical Advisory Group to the State Building Code Council voted to adopt two proposals to require electric water and space heating (with some allowances). There were several last-minute changes to the proposal as well as the life-cycle analysis. As a result, the impacts of the policy voted on by the advisory group are unclear, although the new estimates indicated it would increase construction costs. Despite the lack of clarity and the new information contradicting the claims in the written proposal that it would not impact housing affordability, the rules were adopted. Now the proposals move on to the full State Building Code Council later this year.
CALL TO ACTION: Nominate Our Leaders!
May 13, 2022
Interested in participating in our decision-making? Nominate yourself today!
This is a great way to be involved to fight legislative issues and learn another side to your industry that is fun and exciting. Work with peers from four different states.
Minimal time commitment, as we meet only 4-6 times per year. Nominate yourself or a colleague by Friday, June 10th.
Board Positions Available
- 4 At-Large Positions
- 1 Idaho Position
- 1 Montana Position
- 1 Western Washington Position
2-year term (2022 – 2024). All paid 2022 members are eligible to vote.
Please email your nominations to: [email protected].
Great News! Governor to Appoint BIAW and AGC Nominees to State Building Code Council
April 7, 2022
Governor Will Also Pay $70,000 to Settle Records Suit
Under a legal settlement announced today, the two members of the Building Code Council the governor appointed to represent the residential and commercial building industries will resign. Then the governor must replace them with nominees from BIAW and AGC. The governor’s office must also pay BIAW $70,000 in connection with a separate Public Records Act lawsuit.
“This is a tremendous victory for the members of our association, for protecting the cost of housing and for holding elected officials accountable to following the law,” said BIAW Executive VP Greg Lane.
“The Building Code Council makes critical decisions that impact hundreds of thousands of homeowners and businesses. The law was rightfully designed to ensure industries like residential construction, that are directly affected by the code, have a seat at the table when changes are considered.”
Help Stop Unnecessary, Onerous, and Costly Ergonomics Rules on Business
February 22, 2022
HB 1837 would allow the Department of Labor and Industries to impose costly, complicated, and unnecessary regulations on all employers by overturning voter-approved Initiative 841.
Prior to the passage of Initiative 841, The Department of Labor & Industries adopted an 18-page confusing rule that required all employers to identify jobs that pose ergonomic hazards and then do whatever is “technologically and economically feasible” to eliminate those hazards. The “concise explanatory statement” for the rule was 126 pages long and the rules were anticipated to cost employers $725 million back in the early 2000s. That number would be over $1 billion in today’s dollars.
HB 1837, by repealing the initiative, paves the way for L&I to start regulating businesses on this issue again. We need to have all businesses sign in OPPOSED at the hearing on Wednesday and email their legislators to stop this bill from moving.
TODAY: Please sign in “CON”, opposing HB 1837 at Wednesday’s hearing in the Senate. (You must do this before 9:00 AM on Wednesday, February 25, 2022)
Then contact your State Senator to send them an email to OPPOSE HB 1837. Washington’s businesses cannot afford more rules!
Contact State Senator | State Senator Not Listed?
- Employers are already struggling with workforce and supply chain issues. Ergonomics regulations will make these situations worse.
- Ergonomics regulations will cost employers billions and lead to more automation.
- There is no consensus in the medical community on the causes and cures of repetitive motion injuries – individuals all have different risks.
- Ergonomics regulations will exacerbate our worker shortage, particularly in some of our most essential workplaces, by limiting how many hours employees can legally work.
- The Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that despite the passage of Initiative 841 (which prohibited L&I from adopting ergonomics rules), the Department can still require employers to address workplace musculoskeletal disorders (ergonomics) – thus employees are already protected.
- Businesses around the state are still trying to recover from the response to the pandemic. Ergonomics rules will be the nail in the coffin for many.
Thank You for Taking Action Today!
Breaking News Bulletin
February 18, 2022
Masks No Longer Required in Most Places Beginning March 21
COVID-19 Trends Give Leaders Confidence to Look Towards Next Phase of Pandemic Response
“Vaccination remains our most essential protection against severe illness and death from COVID-19. It’s also crucial to prevent our hospitals from being overwhelmed again,” Inslee said. “If you’ve been procrastinating, now is the time to join the more than 80% of eligible Washingtonians who have gotten at least one shot.”
Guidance for K-12 Schools Will Be Updated
“Our students, educators and school employees, and families have been incredibly resilient as we’ve navigated the impacts of the pandemic,” said Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal. “Our efforts over the past two years have led us to this moment. Nearly all of our school employees are vaccinated, the number of vaccinated students increases each day, and we have one of the most robust COVID-19 school testing programs in the country. Moving away from a statewide mask mandate to masks being encouraged is a safe next step as we move from pandemic to endemic.”
Employers Must Continue Adhering to Safe Workplace Protocols
COVID-19 remains a recognized workplace hazard. When masks are no longer required in the workplace, employers must continue taking steps to assess COVID-19 transmission risks to employees and taking steps to minimize those risks. Risks vary depending on the workspace and conditions. Possible steps could include promoting vaccination, improving ventilation, offering face masks, encouraging social distancing or installing sneeze guards or barriers.
Employers are still required to notify workers of potential exposures when a co-worker has a suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19, and, in worksites with 50 or more employees, report outbreaks of 10 or more confirmed cases to the state Department of Labor & Industries.
Employers must also allow workers to continue to wear masks if they choose. In 2021, the Legislature passed SSB 5254, which protects a worker’s right to wear a face covering and other protective devices during a public health emergency. The governor is amending an existing worker safety and protection emergency order, Proclamation 21-08, to reflect this new state law. Proclamation 21-08 already prohibits employers from taking adverse action against a worker for taking COVID-related health actions, including getting vaccinated and taking time off to get vaccinated or seek treatment, and it will now also protect workers from any adverse action for wearing a face covering while we remain in a state of emergency.
“Caution, Compassion and Kindness is What Will Allow Us to Move Forward, Together”
While the transition to the next phase of the pandemic is reason for hope, Inslee emphasized that many families and individuals will continue taking precautions such as wearing face masks at school and work.
URGENT – SIGN IN TO OPPOSE ESHB 1770!
February 16, 2022
REGARDING ENERGY CODES TODAY!
It’s time to do it again! We need to show OPPOSITION for SHB 1770, the bill that would increase the requirements of our state energy code. This bill not only requires all homes to be net zero ready by 2034, it also focuses on greenhouse gas emission reductions rather than energy efficiency which changes the dynamics of the state energy code.
The biggest thing this bill does is create a statewide residential “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments can adopt. This would create confusion by having local governments with codes that are different than the state energy code.
SHB 1770 will increase the costs of housing by thousands of dollars and wreak havoc with the labor and supply chains when it comes to heating and cooling options for housing. In addition, since it moves the energy code further away from natural gas, options for secondary heating and energy efficient appliances will be eliminated for homeowners.
YOUR ACTIONS ARE WORKING! So far, your actions have led to the defeat of two of the four “building decarbonization” bills that are threatening this industry. We can’t let our guard down now.
You must sign in BEFORE 9 AM tomorrow to be counted on the record.
THANK YOU AND KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
Sign In Opposing ESHB 1770 | View Full Bill
URGENT – CALL YOUR LEGISLATORS TODAY!
February 11, 2022
TELL THEM TO OPPOSE SHB 1770 – WHICH WILL MAKE WASHINGTON STATE’S ENERGY CODE EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE AND DIFFICULT.
The Washington State House of Representatives is poised to take a vote on SHB 1770 – strengthening energy codes. This bill makes significant changes to the existing state energy code. It changes the goal from one of “energy efficiency” to greenhouse gas emission reductions. This will force all new residential buildings to full electrification – regardless of whether or not non-electric appliances would be more affordable and energy-efficient. It also creates a “reach” or “stretch” code that local governments could adopt – which would be more stringent and restrictive than the state energy code.
Why OPPOSE SHB 1770:
- It would be devastating to housing affordability in Washington State – increasing the cost of building a home by thousands of dollars – particularly if homes are required to be “net zero ready” or “solar ready” as is demanded by this bill.
- It would encourage the banning of natural gas connections – particularly through the local reach code – putting millions of Washingtonians at risk when power outages occur because they would not have a secondary heating or cooking resource and reducing the ability to choose the most efficient, affordable energy source for their home.
- It exacerbates the labor shortage. Requiring builders to make all houses “net zero ready” and to be “solar ready” will require more electricians than are available now. In addition, current laws actually keep specialty electricians from doing some of the needed work which means fewer available workers, more delays and more cost.
- It exacerbates the supply chain issue – Washington state builders and contractors are already limited in what they can use in residential construction because of our existing strict energy code (which just went into effect during the pandemic). This would put even more product out of reach for Washington builders – -increasing costs and delays and disrupting attempts to build affordable housing.
LEGISLATORS NEED TO SET THIS BILL DOWN. OUR CURRENT STATE ENERGY CODE ALREADY IS WORKING TOWARD VERY STRINGENT GOALS THAT WILL HELP CLIMATE CHANGE. LET THE CURRENT PROCESS WORK AND DO NOT ADD NEW GOALS OR REQUIREMENTS THAT INCREASE THE COST OF HOUSING, LEAD TO BANS ON NATURAL GAS, AND EXACERBATE THE SUPPLY CHAIN! WASHINGTON CITIZENS CAN NOT AFFORD THIS BILL!
CONTACT YOUR TWO STATE REPRESENTATIVES TODAY! TELL THEM TO VOTE NO ON SHB 1770 TO PRESERVE JOBS AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING!
To Contact your Two-State Reps – follow this link to FIND YOUR DISTRICT and identify your two representatives. Then go to this link to FIND THEIR EMAIL AND PHONE NUMBER so you can contact them directly.
URGENT – YOUR ACTION NEEDED NOW!! KEY HEARING ON FRIDAY
January 11, 2022
ACTION REQUESTED: THE HEARTH INDUSTRY IN WASHINGTON STATE NEEDS TO GET INVOLVED NOW!
TAKE ACTION: Use this form* to indicate that you are OPPOSED to the bill. Select CON from the first dropdown.
SUBMIT YOUR POSITION. CLICK HERE >>> SIGN IN OPPOSED, NO TESTIMONY
*Be sure to select CON from the first dropdown to indicate your position.
We need to get as many people as possible in the industry to SIGN IN OPPOSED to the bill.
It’s week one of the Washington State Legislature and we already have almost 1,000 bills introduced for the 60-day session. One of the bills is a major threat to the hearth industry (to both wood and gas) and will be discussed at a hearing THIS FRIDAY.
HB 1767 is the “Targeted Electrification Bill” which requires utilities (including gas utilities) to make plans to move people away from fossil fuel-burning appliances. It has a hearing in the House Environment and Energy Committee from 10 AM-12 PM this Friday, January 14th!
“Targeted Electrification” is defined as: the conversion to electricity from fossil fuel or wood of an energy end-use or energy source in a way that provides a net benefit to the utility as determined consistent with subsection (3) of this section.
This definition would have utilities not only working to move customers away from gas appliances but also wood appliances.
THIS IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THE HEARTH INDUSTRY! Not only will it be used to eliminate gas appliances as a primary or secondary heating source, but it also potentially could bring the elimination of woodstoves as a primary or secondary heating source.
WAGE & HOUR BULLETIN: L&I Webinars Can Help You Understand Washington’s Wage & Hour Laws
January 4, 2022
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries’ (L&I) Employment Standards Program is hosting 20 webinars early in 2022 to help employers and workers understand Washington’s wage and hour laws.
The webinar topics include protections for isolated workers, overtime exemptions for white-collar workers, and requirements under the Equal Pay and Opportunities Act. There are also webinars available in English and Spanish that explain the new agricultural overtime law that took effect on January 1, 2022. The program also offers webinars that provide an overview of minimum wage, overtime, paid sick leave, and other workplace rights regulations.
To find the times and to register for any of these webinars, go to L&I’s Workshops & Training web page and search for the webinar by its title in the “Event Title” drop-down menu.
First Quarter of 2022 Webinar Schedule:
January:
5 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
11 – Isolated Worker Protections
12 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
19 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
20 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
25 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
26 – Know Your Worker Rights
February:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
In8 – Isolated Worker Protections
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
22 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
March:
2 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws
9 – Employers Guide to Workers’ Rights
16 – White Collar Overtime Exemptions
17 – Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
23 – Know Your Worker Rights
29 – Understanding the Changes in Agricultural Overtime Laws (Spanish)
Interpretation Services
L&I can provide interpretation services for these sessions at no cost to you when you request them ahead of time. Send an email to [email protected] to request these services.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact Employment Standards Program at their website, by phone, or by email.
Important Update Regarding Washington’s Long-Term Care Program & Collection of Employee Premiums
December 30, 2021
Over the last two weeks, we have reached out to the Governor’s Office and Employment Security Department to advocate for the important change to the rule. Unfortunately, neither the governor nor the agency has immediate plans to revise the rule. As a result, the existing rule, with its employer liability, remains the law.
- (2) When an employer is found by the department to be noncompliant with collecting premiums from an employee, the employer must file an amended report and pay the past due premiums.
Without a change in the rule, the employers’ liability still exists, despite public statements by policy makers.
WA Cares Fund Premium Delayed
December 17, 2021
In case you missed it: Gov. Jay Inslee, together with Senate Majority Leader Andy Billig and House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, released the following statements this morning on delaying the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment:
“I have been in ongoing discussions with legislators about the long-term care bill, which is set to begin collecting funds in January. This bill will help provide much-needed care and coverage for Washingtonians as they age. However, legislators have identified some areas that need adjustments and I agree. We need to give legislators the opportunity to make refinements to the bill. Therefore, I am taking measures within my authority and ordering the state Employment Security Department not to collect the premiums from this program from employers before they come due in April. My actions mean that the state will not collect those funds until the Legislature sorts through these issues. While legislation is under consideration to pause the withholding of LTC fees, employers will not be subject to penalties and interest for not withholding fees from employees’ wages during this transition.” – Gov. Jay Inslee
“The Legislature passed the Long-Term Services and Supports Act, now known as the Washington Cares Fund, in 2019 to ensure the people of Washington have a convenient, cost-effective long-term care option they can rely on without bankrupting them or denying them coverage for pre-existing conditions. The legislature has the opportunity to delay the Cares Fund premium assessment this year in order to make improvements to the Fund during the 2022 legislative session and we fully intend to do so. Pausing the program so that it can better serve disabled veterans, military spouses, non-residents, and near retirees will improve the program. A pause will also give the Long-Term Care Commission the ability to study and make recommendations about residents who move out of Washington to retire and assure that those who have opted out of the program maintain their private insurance policies. These improvements will provide security and stability now and into the future for this critical safety net for our state’s seniors and people with disabilities.
“Delaying implementation of the Washington Cares Fund premium assessment through the 2023 legislative session allows the Legislature time to pass the policy reforms that are ready to go now and to consider further recommendations from the Long-Term Care Commission.
“In addition to delaying the premium assessment, we also support employers pausing premium collections from employees in Washington so lawmakers can take necessary action. While we cannot direct employers not to collect, we strongly encourage them to pause on collecting premiums from employees, giving us time to pass legislation extending implementation dates until next year. We know that this extra time will allow us to find solutions and craft updates to the Fund that allows Washingtonians to age with dignity in their own homes.” – Sen. Andy Billig and Speaker Laurie Jinkins.
Successful Factory Tours Come to a Close
December 3, 2021
NWHPBA and HPBA manufacturers opened their doors this year to legislators from Idaho and Washington. These tours, originally done to showcase the work our manufacturers have done in creating clean-burning woodstoves to meet new EPA NSPS guidelines, also helped educate legislators about an important industry creating jobs in their district.
Kuma, IHP, Travis, and Blaze King all hosted their district legislators. Legislators received a tour of the factories, met employees, and learned about the nuances of manufacturing woodstoves (and gas appliances too). All of the manufacturers emphasized the differences between cordwood and crib testing methods and what the controversy around those testing methods meant for their industry.
All of the legislators involved are willing now to engage in woodstove policy discussions. They all appreciated learning what is involved and how wood and gas heating appliances not only provide beneficial heat for people in their districts but also how the hearth industry is providing needed jobs and benefits.
A summary video has been completed for each tour to help other NWHPBA and HPBA members see what is involved and how bringing legislators to your business can help bring our advocacy efforts to a new level. You can see these videos below.
We encourage all retailers and manufacturers to invite local legislators in to see what you do, visit with your employees, and understand the importance of the industry to your community. For assistance in setting up a legislative visit, please contact Carolyn Logue at [email protected].
Lawsuit Filed Against Washington’s Long-Term Care Program, WA Cares Fund
November 11, 2021
Article from The Seattle Times by Rachel La Corte
Written November 9, 2021 | Updated November 10, 2021
OLYMPIA – Opponents of a mandatory payroll tax to fund Washington state’s new long-term care program filed a lawsuit Tuesday in federal court seeking to stop the January start of the payroll premium for most employees in the state.
The suit filed with the federal court for the Western District of Washington, was filed on behalf of three businesses in the state and six individuals. None of the individuals purchased a private, long-term care insurance plan before Nov. 1, the deadline to qualify for an exemption.
Under the program, WA Cares Fund, workers will pay .58% of total pay per paycheck, meaning an employee with a salary of $50,000 will pay $290 a year. Starting
Jan. 1, 2025, people who need help with assistance with at least three “activities of daily living” such as bathing, dressing or administration of medication, can tap into the fund to pay for things like in-home care, home modifications like a wheelchair ramp and rides to the doctor.
The benefit will also cover home-delivered meals and reimbursement to unpaid family caregivers. The lifetime maximum of the benefit is $36,500, with annual increases to be determined based on inflation.
“The state simply does not have the power to mandate an employee benefit,” Richard Birmingham, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, said in a written statement announcing the lawsuit.
As of Nov. 4, the Employment Security Department had received more than 344,000 applications for an exemption, and just over 140,000 had been approved. Last week, agency spokesman Nick Demerice said that people seeking an exemption are being told that as long as they submit their exemption request by Dec. 1, ESD is guaranteeing that it will be processed it before the end of December.
Even though a private policy had to be purchased before Nov. 1 to opt out, people have until Dec. 31, 2022, to apply for an exemption — which means they may pay a year of the premium unless they opt out before the payroll deduction starts. No rebates are offered for any premiums already paid, and once a person receives an exemption, they are not able to opt back into the state program, even if they change jobs.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Jay Inslee said the office had not yet seen the lawsuit. Officials at the Employment Security Department and the Department of Social and Health Services, also named in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.
According to AARP of Washington, 70% of residents 65 and older will require some type of assistance to live independently.
To be eligible for the state benefits, workers will have had to have paid the premium working at least 500 hours per year for three of the previous six years in which they’re seeking the benefit or for a total of 10 years, with at least five of those paid without interruption. The benefit is not portable, so people who pay into the program but later move out of state will not be able to access it, and it only covers the taxpayer, not a spouse or dependent. The benefit also isn’t available to those who work in Washington and will pay the deduction but live in neighboring states, like Oregon.
One of the named plaintiffs, Melissa Johnston, lives in Eagle Point, and works in Vancouver, Washington, and said in a written statement that she has no plan to retire in Washington.
“And yet the state is requiring that I buy a long-term care insurance product that can only be used if I retire in Washington—it just doesn’t make any sense,” she wrote.
Among the arguments made by the suit is that the WA Cares Fund violates a federal law that forbids the state from passing any law that requires employees to participate in a plan that provides sickness or medical benefits. It also says that the disparate treatment of people paying the tax but not receiving benefits if they are not a Washington resident violates the Equal Protection and the Privileges and Immunities clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
Additionally, the fact that people who are within 10 years of retirement will pay into the fund but not receive benefits is a violation of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, the suit contends.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – L&I Considers Contractor Registration Fee Increases
November 2, 2021
The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) is considering raising the fee to register, renew or be reinstated as a contractor by 5.79%. The amount of the increase is the state Office of Financial Management’s maximum allowable fiscal growth factor rate for fiscal year 2022.
The increase is needed to ensure the Contractor Registration program remains consistent with fee increases required by statute and to help improve the program’s fund balance.
L&I is required to charge a fee for issuing or renewing a certificate of registration and to revise the fee at least once every two years in recognition of economic changes as reflected by the fiscal growth factor under chapter 43.135 RCW.
The current fee for a certificate of registration is $117.90. The certificate of registration lasts for two years.
The fee increase would affect WAC 296-200A-900, What fees does the department charge contractors for issuance, renewal, reregistration, and reinstatement of certificates of registration?
The agency filed a Preproposal Statement of Inquiry (CR-101) about the fee increase on October 19, 2021.
Opportunities to Comment:
There will be opportunities to provide written comments or present testimony at public hearings. You can find information about this rulemaking by going online to the agency’s “Rulemaking Activity” page.
If adopted, the new fees would take effect April 22, 2022.
Here’s What Happens Next:
- October 19, 2021: Pre-proposal (CR-101) filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- December 21, 2021: The Proposed rules (CR-102) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser
- January 26, 2022: A public hearing on the proposed rules is tentatively scheduled.
- March 22, 2022: The final rules (CR-103) are expected to be filed with the state Office of the Code Reviser.
- April 22, 2022: The new rules are expected to take effect.
L&I may be considering additional fiscal growth factor fee increases for Contractor Registration for fiscal years 2023 and 2024. We will have more information as these possible rulemakings move forward.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Melissa McBride at [email protected], or call 360-902-5731. L&I Newsroom.
The Federal Government Makes It Official: It Will Cost More to Heat This Winter in Most Regions
October 13, 2021
Article by John Crouch, Director, Public Affairs, HPBA
Anyone who has purchased gasoline recently already suspects that energy may cost more this winter, but some families, in some parts of the country, may be in for a really big surprise. On October 13th the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) released their annual report known as the Winter Fuels Outlook. In this assessment, EIA calculates home heating costs for four regions of the U.S., and the five major fuels used, based on the most recent weather and energy price data.
One of the most striking items in this report is that virtually all households in the U.S. will see an increase in heating costs, based on the combination of higher energy prices, and forecasts of a colder winter that last year.
Families that heat with oil will see an average increase in expenditures of 43% over last year. While households that heat with natural gas will see an average national increase of 30% in expenditures, those in the Midwest will see an increase of 48%, followed by western families with an increase of 23 %. Even families in the south, that heat with propane, will see a 43% increase in winter heating costs. All the details can be found in the EIA report.
This report makes no assumptions about power outages, which are increasingly common in many areas, as we saw in Oregon and Texas last February. HPBA members know it has always paid to have a secondary source of heat, to provide security and create options to balance out price spikes. In Texas, Todd Harkrider, a fireplace retailer, noted: “most of our customers stayed nice and cozy inside their homes despite the electrical outage last winter, using their gas fireplaces for heat and cooking on their gas stoves. Some told me they were the most popular house in the neighborhood since they were the only place with heat.”
In Colorado, Lesley Short, owner of Lehrer’s Fireplace shops in Denver, adds, “If you’ve lived in Colorado very long, you know that blizzards can knock out our power, which is why lots of folks have either a gas fireplace, or an EPA-certified wood insert to keep warm, not to mention an outdoor grill for emergency cooking.”
The annual report from EIA is an early warning for what consumers are going to face this year. Our hope is this encourages consumers to think about a secondary source of heat – something our retailers know all about.
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries Update – For 2022, Washington Minimum Wage Rises to $14.49 Per Hour
Sept. 30, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) announced Wednesday the state’s minimum wage will rise to $14.49 per hour starting Jan. 1, 2022.
State law mandates L&I calculate the minimum wage for the coming year based on the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). L&I compares the CPI-W from August of the previous year to the index for August of the current year to make the calculation.
The result is the state’s current minimum wage of $13.69 will go up 5.83 percent next year. BLS attributed the increase in the price index to more expensive gas, housing, household furnishings, and food.
The state minimum wage applies to workers age 16 and older. Under state law, employers can pay 85 percent of the minimum wage to workers ages 14-15. For 2022, the wage for that younger group will be $12.32 per hour.
Cities are able to set minimum wages higher than the state’s, and both Seattle and Sea-Tac have higher wages.
For Overtime Exempt Employees:
The change in the minimum wage also means an increase in the minimum salary an employee must earn in 2022 to be overtime exempt. This impacts “white collar” positions held by executive, administrative, and professional workers plus computer professionals and outside salespeople.
Under the state’s rules governing exemptions to the Minimum Wage Act, salaried exempt employees must earn at least a minimum salary that is established as a multiplier of the minimum wage. Therefore, when the minimum wage increases, so does the salary threshold.
Those rules were updated in 2020. L&I created an eight-year implementation schedule that incrementally raises the multiplier until it reaches 2.5 times in 2028. The pace of the increase is based on the size of the employer.
For 2022, to be exempt from overtime, an employee must earn at least $1,014.30 a week ($52,743.60 a year), or 1.75 times the minimum wage.
Computer professionals who are paid by the hour have a different threshold. The new minimums are a part of changes to the overtime rules that took effect July 1, 2020.
The minimum wage applies to most jobs, including those in agriculture. In addition, agricultural workers will be eligible to earn overtime after working more than 55 hours per week, beginning Jan. 1, 2022.
L&I enforces the state’s wage-and-hour laws and investigates all wage-payment complaints.
More information about the minimum wage is available on L&I’s website, as are details about overtime, rest breaks, meal periods, and information on how to file a complaint. Employers and workers may also call 360-902-5316 or 1-866-219-7321.
For media information: Matthew Erlich, L&I Public Affairs, 360-902-6508.
L&I Newsroom. Connect with L&I: Facebook and Twitter.
Washington State Quick Legislative Update
September 23, 2021
A number of things are happening of interest:
CALL TO ACTION: STATE BUILDING CODE COUNCIL TO HOLD SPECIAL MEETING TO HEAR COMMENTS ON THE COMMERCIAL ENERGY CODE
The State Building Code Council ran out of time last week and did not hear public comments on the commercial energy code proposal. They will be holding another virtual meeting Thursday, September 30, 2021 from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM to take comments.
Three specific proposals are concerning for those who want to maintain energy choice. Proposals 21-GP1-103 and 21-GP1-136 ban the use of fossil fuel heat pumps and water heaters in the commercial code. Proposal 21-GP1-179 requires electrical connections every place there is a fossil fuel appliance – significantly increasing the cost of putting in gas appliances. If these pass in the commercial code, it is more likely they will become part of the residential energy code updates next year.
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO CALL IN OR SEND AN EMAIL TO OPPOSE THESE SPECIFIC PROPOSALS THAT WILL EFFECTIVELY BAN NATURAL GAS IN COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.
To send an email opposing Proposals 21-GP1-103, 21-GP1-236 and 21-GP1-179, send to Members of the Washington State Building Council.
Washington State Truck Parking Action Plan Metroquest Survey
September 20, 2021
The Washington State Legislature is seeking feedback from the trucking industry, especially truck drivers, on truck parking issues and strategies as part of a Truck Parking Action Plan for Washington State.
Your firsthand knowledge will help the Legislature better understand the current issues and create strategies to address near and long-term truck parking needs.
Please take a few minutes to complete the survey below and share it within your organization through September 30, 2021.
You can visit the Truck Parking Action Plan website for more information.
Washington State Emergency Heat Exposure Rules Increases Protection for Outdoor Workers
Employers Must Take Additional Precautions to Prevent Heat-Related Illness
July 9, 2021
TUMWATER — The Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) filed an emergency rule today to provide increased protection for employees exposed to extreme heat, including those working in agriculture, construction and other outdoor industries. The emergency Outdoor Heat Exposure rule clarifies proactive steps that employers must take to prevent outdoor workers from suffering heat-related illness.
“The heat experienced in our state this year has reached catastrophic levels. The physical risk to individuals is significant, in particular those whose occupations have them outdoors all day,” said Gov. Jay Inslee. “Our state has rules in place to ensure these risks are mitigated, however, the real impacts of climate change have changed conditions since those rules were first written and we are responding.”
The new regulations, which take effect on July 13, are in addition to existing rules. When the temperature is at or above 100 degrees, employers must respond to the extreme heat by:
- Provide water that is cool enough to drink safely;
- Allow and encourage workers to take additional paid preventative cool-down rest to protect from overheating;
- Be prepared by having a written outdoor heat exposure safety program and providing training to employees; and,
- Respond appropriately to any employee with symptoms of heat-related illness.
The emergency rules update existing rules that are in place annually from May through the end of September. The existing rules already require ready access to at least one quart of drinking water per worker per hour, an outdoor heat exposure safety program with training, and an appropriate response to workers who are experiencing heat-related illness symptoms.
L&I will file an official notification for permanent rulemaking. Known as a CR-101, the notification is the first step in the process of updating the existing state Outdoor Heat Exposure Rule established in 2008.
“The recent heat wave is a reminder that extreme temperatures can be a real danger in the workplace. With more hot weather on the way, we’re taking action now,” said L&I Director Joel Sacks. “The emergency rule clarifies existing requirements and outlines commonsense steps employers must take to keep the workers who are responsible for growing our food, paving our roads, and putting up our buildings safe on the job.”
Craig Blackwood, acting assistant director for L&I’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, said the agency is already stepping up awareness and outreach efforts to amplify the existing rules and the tools in place to help employers and workers.
“In most cases, employers are doing the right thing and complying with the current heat stress rules,” said Blackwood. “The emergency rule clarifies the requirements and prompts employers to plan ahead for any further extreme heat waves that may happen this summer. As one of only three states in the nation with an outdoor heat stress rule, we have a good foundation to build on,” he said.
Working outdoors in hot weather is a health hazard that can result in serious medical conditions, including disability or death. Washington has on average 55 workers’ compensation claims per year for heat-related illnesses.
If you work outside, remember to start your workday fully hydrated, drink at least a quart of water every hour, know the early warning signs of heat stress and pay close attention to how you are feeling, and take regular breaks to cool yourself down. If you feel sick, stop working, move to a shaded place if possible, and tell someone so they can help monitor your symptoms or get help.
In the coming months, L&I will gather information from stakeholders to help create an initial draft of the updated Outdoor Heat Exposure rule. Like all permanent rulemaking processes, there will be opportunities for public input during the process.
Visit L&I’s Be Heat Smart web page for additional steps employers can take to protect employees working in hot temperatures.
For media information: Dina Lorraine, L&I Public Affairs, 360-972-4868
Connect with L&I: L&I Newsroom | Facebook | Twitter
What You Should Now About… Washington Coronavirus Response: Economic Resiliency Team – Joint Information Center, Camp Murray
June 3, 2021
View the Response Here or Click Image Below
WA Cares Fund Program Overview: A PowerPoint presentation on the new Long Term Care Act that has a Payroll Tax Going into Effect January 1, 2022.
View Presentation Here or Click Image Below
Masked and Distancing Requirements Are Changing: Key COVID-19 Updates for Fully Vaccinated Workers
May 21, 2021
View Updates Here or Click Flyer Below
